» Articles » PMID: 30014580

Language Experience Influences Audiovisual Speech Integration in Unimodal and Bimodal Bilingual Infants

Overview
Journal Dev Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Jul 18
PMID 30014580
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infants as young as 2 months can integrate audio and visual aspects of speech articulation. A shift of attention from the eyes towards the mouth of talking faces occurs around 6 months of age in monolingual infants. However, it is unknown whether this pattern of attention during audiovisual speech processing is influenced by speech and language experience in infancy. The present study investigated this question by analysing audiovisual speech processing in three groups of 4- to 8-month-old infants who differed in their language experience: monolinguals, unimodal bilinguals (infants exposed to two or more spoken languages) and bimodal bilinguals (hearing infants with Deaf mothers). Eye-tracking was used to study patterns of face scanning while infants were viewing faces articulating syllables with congruent, incongruent and silent auditory tracks. Monolinguals and unimodal bilinguals increased their attention to the mouth of talking faces between 4 and 8 months, while bimodal bilinguals did not show any age difference in their scanning patterns. Moreover, older (6.6 to 8 months), but not younger, monolinguals (4 to 6.5 months) showed increased visual attention to the mouth of faces articulating audiovisually incongruent rather than congruent faces, indicating surprise or novelty. In contrast, no audiovisual congruency effect was found in unimodal or bimodal bilinguals. Results suggest that speech and language experience influences audiovisual integration in infancy. Specifically, reduced or more variable experience of audiovisual speech from the primary caregiver may lead to less sensitivity to the integration of audio and visual cues of speech articulation.

Citing Articles

Bilingual toddlers show increased attention capture by static faces compared to monolinguals.

Mousley V, MacSweeney M, Mercure E Biling (Camb Engl). 2023; 26(4):835-844.

PMID: 37636491 PMC: 7614981. DOI: 10.1017/S136672892200092X.


Visual attention for linguistic and non-linguistic body actions in non-signing and native signing children.

Bosworth R, Hwang S, Corina D Front Psychol. 2022; 13:951057.

PMID: 36160576 PMC: 9505519. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951057.


Face Processing in Early Development: A Systematic Review of Behavioral Studies and Considerations in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Carnevali L, Gui A, Jones E, Farroni T Front Psychol. 2022; 13:778247.

PMID: 35250718 PMC: 8894249. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778247.


Multisensory integration and maternal sensitivity are related to each other and predictive of expressive vocabulary in 24-month-olds.

Bruce M, Panneton R, Taylor C J Exp Child Psychol. 2021; 214:105304.

PMID: 34624708 PMC: 8608724. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105304.


Language Experience Impacts Brain Activation for Spoken and Signed Language in Infancy: Insights From Unimodal and Bimodal Bilinguals.

Mercure E, Evans S, Pirazzoli L, Goldberg L, Bowden-Howl H, Coulson-Thaker K Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020; 1(1):9-32.

PMID: 32274469 PMC: 7145445. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00001.


References
1.
Mercure E, Kushnerenko E, Goldberg L, Bowden-Howl H, Coulson K, Johnson M . Language experience influences audiovisual speech integration in unimodal and bimodal bilingual infants. Dev Sci. 2018; 22(1):e12701. PMC: 6393757. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12701. View

2.
Ayneto A, Sebastian-Galles N . The influence of bilingualism on the preference for the mouth region of dynamic faces. Dev Sci. 2016; 20(1). DOI: 10.1111/desc.12446. View

3.
McGurk H, Macdonald J . Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976; 264(5588):746-8. DOI: 10.1038/264746a0. View

4.
Kushnerenko E, Teinonen T, Volein A, Csibra G . Electrophysiological evidence of illusory audiovisual speech percept in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(32):11442-5. PMC: 2516214. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804275105. View

5.
Waldstein R . Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88(5):2099-114. DOI: 10.1121/1.400107. View