» Articles » PMID: 30008492

Recovering : The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research

Overview
Publisher MIT Press
Date 2018 Jul 17
PMID 30008492
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 3Rs, or the replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal research, are widely accepted as the best approach to maximizing high-quality science while ensuring the highest standard of ethical consideration is applied in regulating the use of animals in scientific procedures. This contrasts with the muted scientific interest in the 3Rs when they were first proposed in (1959). Indeed, the relative success of the 3Rs has done little to encourage engagement with their original text, which remains little read and out of print. By adopting a historical perspective, this article argues that one explanation for this disjunction may be found in another, more celebrated, event of 1959: C. P. Snow's Rede lecture on . The moral outlook of derived from an earlier ethos wherein humanistic and scientific values occupied a shared culture. While the synthetic style of has hindered its readership, this article concludes that there is value to recovering the notion that the humanities and social sciences can contribute to the improvement of animal research.

Citing Articles

Data Hazards as An Ethical Toolkit for Neuroscience.

Garcia S, Welsh C, Di Cara N, Sterratt D, Romano N, Stefan M Neuroethics. 2025; 18(1):15.

PMID: 39980970 PMC: 11835915. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-024-09580-3.


New Benzothiazole-Monoterpenoid Hybrids as Multifunctional Molecules with Potential Applications in Cosmetics.

Kirkova D, Stremski Y, Bachvarova M, Todorova M, Goranov B, Statkova-Abeghe S Molecules. 2025; 30(3).

PMID: 39942740 PMC: 11820011. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30030636.


Conceptual foundations for a clarified meaning of the 3Rs principles in animal experimentation.

Louis-Maerten E, Rodriguez Perez C, Cajiga R, Persson K, Elger B Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e37.

PMID: 39347486 PMC: 11428052. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.39.


Culture of care: the question of animal agency in laboratory animal science.

Ameli K, Kramer S Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1373778.

PMID: 39318601 PMC: 11420019. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1373778.


Figuring the 'cynical scientist' in British animal science: the politics of invisibility.

Holmes T, Friese C Biosocieties. 2024; 18(4):780-800.

PMID: 38798880 PMC: 11116093. DOI: 10.1057/s41292-023-00312-z.


References
1.
Kirk R . 'Wanted-standard guinea pigs': standardisation and the experimental animal market in Britain ca. 1919-1947. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008; 39(3):280-91. PMC: 3302564. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.06.002. View

2.
Anderson W . Getting ahead of one's self? The common culture of immunology and philosophy. Isis. 2015; 105(3):606-16. DOI: 10.1086/678176. View

3.
Tannenbaum J, Bennett B . Russell and Burch's 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015; 54(2):120-32. PMC: 4382615. View

4.
Davies G, Greenhough B, Hobson-West P, Kirk R, Applebee K, Bellingan L . Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158791. PMC: 4948886. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158791. View