» Articles » PMID: 18761280

'Wanted-standard Guinea Pigs': Standardisation and the Experimental Animal Market in Britain Ca. 1919-1947

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Sep 2
PMID 18761280
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 1942 a coalition of twenty scientific societies formed the Conference on the Supply of Experimental Animals (CSEA) in an attempt to pressure the Medical Research Council to accept responsibility for the provision of standardised experimental animals in Britain. The practice of animal experimentation was subject to State regulation under the Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876, but no provision existed for the provision of animals for experimental use. Consequently, day-to-day laboratory work was reliant on a commercial small animal market which had emerged to sustain the hobby of animal fancying. This paper explores how difficulties encountered in experimental practice within the laboratory led to the problematisation of biomedical science's reliance upon a commercial market for animals during the inter-war period. This is shown to have produced a crisis within animal reliant experimental science in the early 1940s which enabled the left-wing Association of Scientific Workers to cast science's reliance on a free market as economically inefficient and a threat to the reliability of British research. It is argued that the development of standard experimental animals in Britain was, therefore, embedded within the wider cultural, societal, political and economic national context of the time.

Citing Articles

Figuring the 'cynical scientist' in British animal science: the politics of invisibility.

Holmes T, Friese C Biosocieties. 2024; 18(4):780-800.

PMID: 38798880 PMC: 11116093. DOI: 10.1057/s41292-023-00312-z.


Nonhuman Primates in Public Health: Between Biological Standardization, Conservation and Care.

Druglitro T J Hist Biol. 2023; 56(3):455-477.

PMID: 37477736 PMC: 10611605. DOI: 10.1007/s10739-023-09721-z.


Communicative patterns and social networks between scientists and technicians in a culture of care: discussing morality across a hierarchy of occupational spaces.

Nuyts N, Friese C Soc Cult Geogr. 2023; 24(1):11-30.

PMID: 36712289 PMC: 9872948. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2021.1901976.


A good life? A good death? Reconciling care and harm in animal research.

Roe E, Greenhough B Soc Cult Geogr. 2023; 24(1):49-66.

PMID: 36655137 PMC: 7614075. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2021.1901977.


Feral pharmaceuticalization-Biomedical uses of animal life in light of the global donkey hide trade.

Gameiro M, Quet M Biosocieties. 2023; :1-28.

PMID: 36643825 PMC: 9823251. DOI: 10.1057/s41292-022-00288-2.


References
1.
FELDBERG W . Henry Hallett Dale, 1875-1968. Biogr Mem Fellows R Soc. 1970; 16:77-174. DOI: 10.1098/rsbm.1970.0006. View

2.
Dale H . Autobiographical sketch. Perspect Biol Med. 1958; 1(2):125-37. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.1958.0011. View

3.
Bristow A, Barrowcliffe T, Bangham D . Standardization of biological medicines: the first hundred years, 1900-2000. Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2007; 60(3):271-89. DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2006.0153. View

4.
Clause B . The Wistar Rat as a right choice: establishing mammalian standards and the ideal of a standardized mammal. J Hist Biol. 1993; 26(2):329-49. DOI: 10.1007/BF01061973. View

5.
Askonas B . John Herbert Humphrey: 16 December 1915-25 December 1987. Biogr Mem Fellows R Soc. 1990; 36:275-300. View