» Articles » PMID: 30002509

On the Nature and Use of Models in Network Neuroscience

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Jul 14
PMID 30002509
Citations 132
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Network theory provides an intuitively appealing framework for studying relationships among interconnected brain mechanisms and their relevance to behaviour. As the space of its applications grows, so does the diversity of meanings of the term network model. This diversity can cause confusion, complicate efforts to assess model validity and efficacy, and hamper interdisciplinary collaboration. In this Review, we examine the field of network neuroscience, focusing on organizing principles that can help overcome these challenges. First, we describe the fundamental goals in constructing network models. Second, we review the most common forms of network models, which can be described parsimoniously along the following three primary dimensions: from data representations to first-principles theory; from biophysical realism to functional phenomenology; and from elementary descriptions to coarse-grained approximations. Third, we draw on biology, philosophy and other disciplines to establish validation principles for these models. We close with a discussion of opportunities to bridge model types and point to exciting frontiers for future pursuits.

Citing Articles

Functional and effective EEG connectivity patterns in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Paitel E, Otteman C, Polking M, Licht H, Nielson K Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1496235.

PMID: 40013094 PMC: 11861106. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1496235.


Circuit-Based Understanding of Fine Spatial Scale Clustering of Orientation Tuning in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Yu P, Yang Y, Gozel O, Oldenburg I, Dipoppa M, Rossi F bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990306 PMC: 11844487. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.11.637768.


Basal forebrain innervation of the amygdala: an anatomical and computational exploration.

Tuna T, Banks T, Glickert G, Sevinc C, Nair S, Unal G Brain Struct Funct. 2025; 230(1):30.

PMID: 39805973 PMC: 11729089. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02886-1.


Simulated brain networks reflecting progression of Parkinson's disease.

Jung K, Eickhoff S, Caspers J, Popovych O Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(4):1400-1420.

PMID: 39735513 PMC: 11675161. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00406.


Xenon anaesthesia is associated with a reduction in frontal electroencephalogram peak alpha frequency.

McGuigan S, Pelentritou A, Scott D, Sleigh J BJA Open. 2024; 12:100358.

PMID: 39687274 PMC: 11647626. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100358.


References
1.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View

2.
Amari S, Beltrame F, Bjaalie J, Dalkara T, De Schutter E, Egan G . Neuroinformatics: the integration of shared databases and tools towards integrative neuroscience. J Integr Neurosci. 2004; 1(2):117-28. DOI: 10.1142/s0219635202000128. View

3.
Stam C . Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a 'small-world' network?. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 355(1-2):25-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.063. View

4.
He X, Doucet G, Pustina D, Sperling M, Sharan A, Tracy J . Presurgical thalamic "hubness" predicts surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2017; 88(24):2285-2293. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004035. View

5.
Wang D, Buckner R, Fox M, Holt D, Holmes A, Stoecklein S . Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(12):1853-60. PMC: 4661084. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4164. View