» Articles » PMID: 38800465

From Calcium Imaging to Graph Topology

Overview
Journal Netw Neurosci
Publisher MIT Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 May 27
PMID 38800465
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Systems neuroscience is facing an ever-growing mountain of data. Recent advances in protein engineering and microscopy have together led to a paradigm shift in neuroscience; using fluorescence, we can now image the activity of every neuron through the whole brain of behaving animals. Even in larger organisms, the number of neurons that we can record simultaneously is increasing exponentially with time. This increase in the dimensionality of the data is being met with an explosion of computational and mathematical methods, each using disparate terminology, distinct approaches, and diverse mathematical concepts. Here we collect, organize, and explain multiple data analysis techniques that have been, or could be, applied to whole-brain imaging, using larval zebrafish as an example model. We begin with methods such as linear regression that are designed to detect relations between two variables. Next, we progress through network science and applied topological methods, which focus on the patterns of relations among many variables. Finally, we highlight the potential of generative models that could provide testable hypotheses on wiring rules and network progression through time, or disease progression. While we use examples of imaging from larval zebrafish, these approaches are suitable for any population-scale neural network modeling, and indeed, to applications beyond systems neuroscience. Computational approaches from network science and applied topology are not limited to larval zebrafish, or even to systems neuroscience, and we therefore conclude with a discussion of how such methods can be applied to diverse problems across the biological sciences.

Citing Articles

Modular subgraphs in large-scale connectomes underpin spontaneous co-fluctuation events in mouse and human brains.

Ragone E, Tanner J, Jo Y, Zamani Esfahlani F, Faskowitz J, Pope M Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):126.

PMID: 38267534 PMC: 10810083. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05766-w.


Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes.

Betzel R, Faskowitz J, Sporns O Trends Cogn Sci. 2023; 27(11):1068-1084.

PMID: 37716895 PMC: 10592364. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.009.


Network inference from short, noisy, low time-resolution, partial measurements: Application to neuronal calcium dynamics.

Banerjee A, Chandra S, Ott E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(12):e2216030120.

PMID: 36927154 PMC: 10041139. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216030120.

References
1.
Cekic S, Grandjean D, Renaud O . Time, frequency, and time-varying Granger-causality measures in neuroscience. Stat Med. 2018; 37(11):1910-1931. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7621. View

2.
Sporns O . Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018; 20(2):111-121. PMC: 6136126. View

3.
Quian Quiroga R, Panzeri S . Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(3):173-85. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2578. View

4.
Hildebrand D, Cicconet M, Torres R, Choi W, Minh Quan T, Moon J . Whole-brain serial-section electron microscopy in larval zebrafish. Nature. 2017; 545(7654):345-349. PMC: 5594570. DOI: 10.1038/nature22356. View

5.
Stobb M, Peterson J, Mazzag B, Gahtan E . Graph theoretical model of a sensorimotor connectome in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e37292. PMC: 3356276. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037292. View