» Articles » PMID: 29997637

Ionizing Radiation, Higher Plants, and Radioprotection: From Acute High Doses to Chronic Low Doses

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2018 Jul 13
PMID 29997637
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on plants is important for environmental protection, for agriculture and horticulture, and for space science but plants have significant biological differences to the animals from which much relevant knowledge is derived. The effects of IR on plants are understood best at acute high doses because there have been; (a) controlled experiments in the field using point sources, (b) field studies in the immediate aftermath of nuclear accidents, and (c) controlled laboratory experiments. A compilation of studies of the effects of IR on plants reveals that although there are numerous field studies of the effects of chronic low doses on plants, there are few controlled experiments that used chronic low doses. Using the Bradford-Hill criteria widely used in epidemiological studies we suggest that a new phase of chronic low-level radiation research on plants is desirable if its effects are to be properly elucidated. We emphasize the plant biological contexts that should direct such research. We review previously reported effects from the molecular to community level and, using a plant stress biology context, discuss a variety of acute high- and chronic low-dose data against Derived Consideration Reference Levels (DCRLs) used for environmental protection. We suggest that chronic low-level IR can sometimes have effects at the molecular and cytogenetic level at DCRL dose rates (and perhaps below) but that there are unlikely to be environmentally significant effects at higher levels of biological organization. We conclude that, although current data meets only some of the Bradford-Hill criteria, current DCRLs for plants are very likely to be appropriate at biological scales relevant to environmental protection (and for which they were intended) but that research designed with an appropriate biological context and with more of the Bradford-Hill criteria in mind would strengthen this assertion. We note that the effects of IR have been investigated on only a small proportion of plant species and that research with a wider range of species might improve not only the understanding of the biological effects of radiation but also that of the response of plants to environmental stress.

Citing Articles

Determination of optimal gamma radiation dose for mutation breeding in 'Sabz' fig (Ficus carica L.) cuttings based on radiosensitivity and phenotypic changes.

Ghasemi-Soloklui A, Kordrostami M, Jafari M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313017.

PMID: 39813234 PMC: 11734895. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313017.


The role of signaling systems of plant in responding to key astrophysical factors: increased ionizing radiation, near-null magnetic field and microgravity.

Grinberg M, Vodeneev V Planta. 2025; 261(2):31.

PMID: 39797920 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-025-04610-7.


Combined Effects of Microgravity and Chronic Low-Dose Gamma Radiation on Microgreens.

De Francesco S, Le Disquet I, Pereda-Loth V, Tisseyre L, De Pascale S, Amitrano C Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39795322 PMC: 11722926. DOI: 10.3390/plants14010064.


The transcription factor FcMYB3 responds to Co γ-ray irradiation of axillary buds in L. by activating the expression of the NADPH oxidase, .

Song M, Chen Z, Bahayiding W, Li J, Ma H, Wang Z Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1476126.

PMID: 39659416 PMC: 11628289. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1476126.


The physiology of plants in the context of space exploration.

Maffei M, Balestrini R, Costantino P, Lanfranco L, Morgante M, Battistelli A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1311.

PMID: 39394270 PMC: 11470014. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06989-7.


References
1.
Marcu D, Cristea V, Daraban L . Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata) seedlings. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012; 89(3):219-23. DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2013.734946. View

2.
STADLER L . Genetic Effects of X-Rays in Maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1928; 14(1):69-75. PMC: 1085350. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.14.1.69. View

3.
Kovalchuk I, Abramov V, Pogribny I, Kovalchuk O . Molecular aspects of plant adaptation to life in the Chernobyl zone. Plant Physiol. 2004; 135(1):357-63. PMC: 429389. DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.040477. View

4.
Pattison D, Davies M . Actions of ultraviolet light on cellular structures. EXS. 2005; (96):131-57. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_6. View

5.
Rocha E . Using Sex to Cure the Genome. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(3):e1002417. PMC: 4795794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002417. View