» Articles » PMID: 29992404

Minimally Invasive Interval Cytoreductive Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Jul 12
PMID 29992404
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in other gynecologic cancers has shown benefits with similar oncologic outcomes. However, the biology and complexity of surgery for ovarian cancer may preclude this approach for ovarian cancer patients. Our objective is to assess feasibility to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients via minimally invasive surgery. Our data sources include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biosis, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model with DerSimonian and Laird estimator for the amount of heterogeneity to estimate the pooled outcomes. A funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to test publication bias. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. There were 6 studies (3 prospective, 3 retrospective) that met the criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 3231 patients, 567 were in the minimally invasive group and 2664 in the laparotomy group. Both groups were similar in stage and serous histology. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 74.50% (95% CI 40.41-97.65%) and 53.10% (95% CI 4.88-97.75%) of patients in the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between these 2 pooled proportions (p = 0.52). Three studies compared minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in obtaining complete cytoreductive surgery [OR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.70-1.16; p = 0.43)]. A symmetrical funnel plot indicated no publication bias. The pooled proportion for grade > 2 postoperative complications was not significant among the laparoscopy group [3.11% (95% CI 0.00-10.24%; p = 0.15)]. Complete cytoreductive surgery appears feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery in selected advanced ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic Treatment of Bulky Nodes in Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Surgical Technique and Outcomes from Two Specialized Italian Centers.

Daniele A, Rosso R, Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, DAncona G, Peano E Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730583 PMC: 11083283. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091631.


An overview of the current debate between using minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for interval cytoreductive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Finch L, Chi D J Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 34(5):e84.

PMID: 37545363 PMC: 10482582. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e84.


Outcomes of Laparoscopic Optimal Interval Cytoreduction Surgery (LOICS) in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancers Having Low Burden Disease.

Gupta V, Rao T, Raju K, Iyer R, Ahmed S, Shah M Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023; 14(1):270-276.

PMID: 36891449 PMC: 9986363. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01682-9.


Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Laparotomy for Interval Debulking Surgery of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis.

Zeng S, Yu Y, Cui Y, Liu B, Jin X, Li Z Front Oncol. 2022; 12:900256.

PMID: 35924170 PMC: 9341245. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.900256.


Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy, for Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Tang Q, Liu W, Jiang D, Tang J, Zhou Q, Zhang J J Oncol. 2022; 2022:2084774.

PMID: 35535312 PMC: 9078848. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2084774.


References
1.
Vergote I, Trope C, Amant F, Kristensen G, Ehlen T, Johnson N . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(10):943-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806. View

2.
Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, Jayson G, Kitchener H, Lopes T . Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(9990):249-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6. View

3.
Onda T, Satoh T, Saito T, Kasamatsu T, Nakanishi T, Nakamura K . Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical.... Eur J Cancer. 2016; 64:22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017. View

4.
Chang S, Bristow R . Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: redefining 'optimal' residual disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 125(2):483-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.024. View

5.
Hamilton C, Miller A, Casablanca Y, Horowitz N, Rungruang B, Krivak T . Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with long-term survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 148(2):275-280. PMC: 5918685. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.018. View