» Articles » PMID: 29972023

Toward Capturing the Exposome: Exposure Biomarker Variability and Coexposure Patterns in the Shared Environment

Overview
Date 2018 Jul 5
PMID 29972023
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many factors affect the variation in the exposome. We examined the influence of shared household and partner's sex in relation to the variation in 128 endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) exposures among couples. In a cohort comprising of 501 couples trying for pregnancy, we measured 128 (13 chemical classes) persistent and nonpersistent EDCs and estimated 1) sex-specific differences; 2) variance explained by shared household; and 3) Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ( r) for females, males, and couples' exposures. Sex was correlated with 8 EDCs including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) ( p < 0.05). Shared household explained 43% and 41% of the total variance for PFASs and blood metals, respectively, but less than 20% for the remaining 11 EDC classes. Coexposure patterns of the exposome were similar between females and males, with within-class r higher for persistent than for nonpersistent chemicals. Median rs of polybrominated compounds and urine metalloids were 0.45 and 0.09, respectively, for females (0.41 and 0.08 for males; 0.21 and 0.04 for couples). Our findings suggest that individual, rather than shared environment, could be a major factor influencing the covariation of the exposome. Understanding the correlations of exposures has important analytical and sampling implications for exposomics research.

Citing Articles

Intestinal carcinogenicity screening of environmental pollutants using organoid-based cell transformation assay.

Wang Z, Chen S, Guo Y, Zhang R, Zhang Q, Jiang X Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98(6):1937-1951.

PMID: 38563870 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03729-y.


Decoding the exposome: data science methodologies and implications in exposome-wide association studies (ExWASs).

Chung M, House J, Akhtari F, Makris K, Langston M, Islam K Exposome. 2024; 4(1):osae001.

PMID: 38344436 PMC: 10857773. DOI: 10.1093/exposome/osae001.


Exposomics as a tool to investigate differences in health and disease by sex and gender.

Bucher M, Anderson F, Lai Y, Dicent J, Miller G, Zota A Exposome. 2023; 3(1):osad003.

PMID: 37122372 PMC: 10125831. DOI: 10.1093/exposome/osad003.


Morphological alterations in C57BL/6 mouse intestinal organoids as a tool for predicting chemical-induced toxicity.

Wang Z, Chen S, Pang Y, Ye L, Zhang Q, Jiang X Arch Toxicol. 2023; 97(4):1133-1146.

PMID: 36806895 PMC: 10045874. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03451-1.


GlobeCorr: interactive globe-based visualization for correlation datasets.

Arab M, Woods N, Garlock E, Winsor G, Parks J, Jia B Bioinform Adv. 2023; 3(1):vbac099.

PMID: 36698766 PMC: 9832964. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbac099.


References
1.
Schisterman E, Whitcomb B, Buck Louis G, Louis T . Lipid adjustment in the analysis of environmental contaminants and human health risks. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(7):853-7. PMC: 1257645. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7640. View

2.
Vrijheid M, Slama R, Robinson O, Chatzi L, Coen M, van den Hazel P . The human early-life exposome (HELIX): project rationale and design. Environ Health Perspect. 2014; 122(6):535-44. PMC: 4048258. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307204. View

3.
Guo Y, Alomirah H, Cho H, Minh T, Ali Mohd M, Nakata H . Occurrence of phthalate metabolites in human urine from several Asian countries. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(7):3138-44. DOI: 10.1021/es103879m. View

4.
Wild C, Scalbert A, Herceg Z . Measuring the exposome: a powerful basis for evaluating environmental exposures and cancer risk. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013; 54(7):480-99. DOI: 10.1002/em.21777. View

5.
Whitehead T, Metayer C, Buffler P, Rappaport S . Estimating exposures to indoor contaminants using residential dust. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011; 21(6):549-64. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2011.11. View