» Articles » PMID: 29960707

Pushing the Limits of Detection: Investigation of Cell-free DNA for Aneuploidy Screening in Embryos

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2018 Jul 2
PMID 29960707
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in spent embryo medium (SEM) for ploidy and sex detection at the cleavage and blastocyst stages. To determine if assisted hatching (AH) and morphologic grade influence cfDNA concentration and accuracy.

Design: Prospective cohort.

Setting: Academic fertility center.

Patient(s): Nine patients undergoing IVF; 41 donated two-pronuclei embryos and 20 embryos from patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Interventions(s): In a donated embryo arm, SEM was collected on days 3 and 5, with one-half of the embryos undergoing AH before and one-half after. In a clinical arm, SEM was collected on day 5 before trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Samples underwent PGT-A with the use of next-generation sequencing. cfDNA results were compared with corresponding whole embryos and TE biopsies.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Concordance rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for ploidy and sex detection with the use of cfDNA.

Result(s): Of 141 samples, cfDNA was amplified in 39% and 80.4% of days 3 and 5 SEM, respectively. Concordances for ploidy and sex, respectively, were 56.3% and 81.3% between day 3 cfDNA and whole embryos, and 65% and 70% between day 5 cfDNA and TE biopsies. Day 5 cfDNA sensitivity and specificity for aneuploidy were 0.8 and 0.61, respectively. PPV and NPV were 0.47 and 0.88, respectively. Timing of AH and morphology did not influence cfDNA concentration or accuracy.

Conclusion(s): cfDNA is detectable on days 3 and 5, but more accurate on day 5. Although our data suggest moderate concordance rates, PGT-A with the use of cfDNA must be further optimized before clinical implementation.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Hu Z, Lian Y, Han Y, Zhou X, Li Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):39.

PMID: 40069837 PMC: 11895315. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.


Comparison of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Using Samples Derived from the Same Embryo Culture.

Bednarska-Czerwinska A, Smolen-Dzirba J, Strychalska A, Sierka W, Wroblewska U, Mermer P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797117 PMC: 11721003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010033.


Advancements and Challenges in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies: In the Pathway to Non-Invasive Techniques.

Del Arco de la Paz A, Gimenez-Rodriguez C, Selntigia A, Meseguer M, Galliano D Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766880 PMC: 11675356. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121613.


Non Invasive Preimplantation Testing for Aneuploidies in Assisted Reproduction: A SWOT Analysis.

de Albornoz E, Dominguez Arroyo J, Iriarte Y, Vendrell X, Vidal V, Roig M Reprod Sci. 2024; 32(1):1-14.

PMID: 39433699 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01698-2.


Conditions for improved accuracy of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: Focusing on the zona pellucida and early blastocysts.

Takeuchi H, Morishita M, Uemura M, Maezawa T, Shibahara T, Takayama E Reprod Med Biol. 2024; 23(1):e12604.

PMID: 39263385 PMC: 11387587. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12604.