» Articles » PMID: 29957943

Machine Learning Adaptive Basis Sets for Efficient Large Scale Density Functional Theory Simulation

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Date 2018 Jun 30
PMID 29957943
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is chemically intuitive that an optimal atom centered basis set must adapt to its atomic environment, for example by polarizing toward nearby atoms. Adaptive basis sets of small size can be significantly more accurate than traditional atom centered basis sets of the same size. The small size and well conditioned nature of these basis sets leads to large saving in computational cost, in particular in a linear scaling framework. Here, it is shown that machine learning can be used to predict such adaptive basis sets using local geometrical information only. As a result, various properties of standard DFT calculations can be easily obtained at much lower costs, including nuclear gradients. In our approach, a rotationally invariant parametrization of the basis is obtained by employing a potential anchored on neighboring atoms to ultimately construct a rotation matrix that turns a traditional atom centered basis set into a suitable adaptive basis set. The method is demonstrated using MD simulations of liquid water, where it is shown that minimal basis sets yield structural properties in fair agreement with basis set converged results, while reducing the computational cost in the best case by a factor of 200 and the required flops by 4 orders of magnitude. Already a very small training set yields satisfactory results as the variational nature of the method provides robustness.

Citing Articles

Shortcut to chemically accurate quantum computing via density-based basis-set correction.

Traore D, Adjoua O, Feniou C, Lygatsika I, Maday Y, Posenitskiy E Commun Chem. 2024; 7(1):269.

PMID: 39557987 PMC: 11574143. DOI: 10.1038/s42004-024-01348-3.


Electronic Excited States from Physically Constrained Machine Learning.

Cignoni E, Suman D, Nigam J, Cupellini L, Mennucci B, Ceriotti M ACS Cent Sci. 2024; 10(3):637-648.

PMID: 38559300 PMC: 10979507. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01480.


Open-Source Machine Learning in Computational Chemistry.

Hagg A, Kirschner K J Chem Inf Model. 2023; 63(15):4505-4532.

PMID: 37466636 PMC: 10430767. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00643.


Ab Initio Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space.

Huang B, Anatole von Lilienfeld O Chem Rev. 2021; 121(16):10001-10036.

PMID: 34387476 PMC: 8391942. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01303.


An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer.

Grimsley H, Economou S, Barnes E, Mayhall N Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):3007.

PMID: 31285433 PMC: 6614426. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2.


References
1.
Skinner L, Huang C, Schlesinger D, Pettersson L, Nilsson A, Benmore C . Benchmark oxygen-oxygen pair-distribution function of ambient water from x-ray diffraction measurements with a wide Q-range. J Chem Phys. 2013; 138(7):074506. DOI: 10.1063/1.4790861. View

2.
Kranz J, Kubillus M, Ramakrishnan R, Anatole von Lilienfeld O, Elstner M . Generalized Density-Functional Tight-Binding Repulsive Potentials from Unsupervised Machine Learning. J Chem Theory Comput. 2018; 14(5):2341-2352. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00933. View

3.
Bowler D, Miyazaki T . Calculations for millions of atoms with density functional theory: linear scaling shows its potential. J Phys Condens Matter. 2011; 22(7):074207. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/7/074207. View

4.
Rupp M, Tkatchenko A, Muller K, Anatole von Lilienfeld O . Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012; 108(5):058301. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301. View

5.
Goedecker , Teter , HUTTER . Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1996; 54(3):1703-1710. DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.1703. View