» Articles » PMID: 29951010

Parental Decision-Making on Childhood Vaccination

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Jun 29
PMID 29951010
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A growing number of parents delay vaccinations or are deciding not to vaccinate their children altogether. This increases the risk of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases and disrupting herd immunity, and also impairs the trust in the capacities of health care systems to protect people. Vaccine hesitancy is related to a range of both psychological and demographic determinants, such as attitudes toward vaccinations, social norms, and trust in science. Our aim is to understand those determinants in parents, because they are a special group in this issue-they act as proxy decision makers for their children, who are unable to decide for themselves. The fact that deciding to vaccinate is a socially forced choice that concerns a child's health makes vaccine-related decisions highly important and involving for parents. This high involvement might lead to parents overemphasizing the potential side effects that they know to be vaccine-related, and by amplifying those, parents are more focused on the potential outcomes of vaccine-related decisions, which can yield specific pattern of the outcome bias. We propose two related studies to investigate factors which promote vaccine hesitancy, protective factors that determine parental vaccination decisions, and outcome bias in parental vaccination intentions. We will explore demographic and psychological factors, and test parental involvement related to vaccine hesitancy using an online battery in a correlation panel design study. The second study is an experimental study, in which we will investigate the moderating role of parents' high involvement in the specific domain of vaccination decision making. We expect that higher involvement among parents, compared to non-parents, will shape the pattern of the proneness to outcome bias. The studies will be conducted across eight countries in Europe and Asia (Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, and the United Kingdom), rendering findings that will aid with understanding the underlying mechanisms of vaccine hesitancy and paving the way for developing interventions custom-made for parents.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Various Types of Decision Makers in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Samaria D, Tallutondok E, Simanjorang C, Imanuel I Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2025; 13(1):28-39.

PMID: 39906253 PMC: 11788782. DOI: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2024.101802.2448.


Ideological diversity of media consumption predicts COVID-19 vaccination.

Grant M, Markowitz D, Sherman D, Flores A, Dickert S, Eom K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28948.

PMID: 39578487 PMC: 11584658. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77408-4.


eHealth Communication Intervention to Promote Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Middle-School Girls: Development and Usability Study.

Kim Y, Lee H, Park J, Kim Y, Kim D, Lee Y JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e59087.

PMID: 39466304 PMC: 11555454. DOI: 10.2196/59087.


Vaccine Beliefs Among Uninsured People Receiving Care at Free Clinics.

C Liu C, A Siliezar J, Alzayat O, Robinson C, Do T, I J Carter A J Community Health. 2024; .

PMID: 39438397 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01416-8.


Parent and family characteristics associated with reported pediatric influenza vaccination in a sample of Canadian digital vaccination platform users. An exploratory, cross-sectional study in the 2018-2019 influenza season.

Atkinson K, Ntacyabukura B, Hawken S, El-Khatib Z, Laflamme L, Wilson K Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2378580.

PMID: 39034882 PMC: 11789738. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2378580.


References
1.
Brunson E . The impact of social networks on parents' vaccination decisions. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(5):e1397-404. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-2452. View

2.
Mills E, Montori V, Ross C, Shea B, Wilson K, Guyatt G . Systematically reviewing qualitative studies complements survey design: an exploratory study of barriers to paediatric immunisations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(11):1101-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.014. View

3.
Zikmund-Fisher B, Sarr B, Fagerlin A, Ubel P . A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(6):618-22. PMC: 1924622. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00410.x. View

4.
Gowda C, Dempsey A . The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013; 9(8):1755-62. PMC: 3906278. DOI: 10.4161/hv.25085. View

5.
Hobson-West P . 'Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all': organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK. Sociol Health Illn. 2007; 29(2):198-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00544.x. View