» Articles » PMID: 29946929

Comparing IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®): Identical Potency Labelling in the Hemidiaphragm Assay

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2018 Jun 28
PMID 29946929
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Botulinum toxin (BT) is provided by several manufacturers producing a number of different drugs. Their potency is given in internationally standardised mouse units (MU). Clinical practise, however, reveals that the potency labelling of different BT drugs may not be identical. We wanted to use the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) to compare the two BT drugs onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) and incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO). For this, we measured the paresis time (PT) of different ONA or INCO doses. All BT came from several different and unexpired drug batches. PT for 20MU were 169.7 ± 28.9 min (ONA) and 132.3 ± 1.5 min (INCO) (p = 0.089), for 60MU 105.3 ± 10.1 min and 84.7 ± 4.2 min (p = 0.031), for 100MU 69.7 ± 1.5 min and 66.0 ± 7.0 min (p = 0.462) and for 140MU 74.7 ± 0.6 min and 62.3 ± 2.1 min (p = 0.100), respectively. The overall PT were 104.8 ± 12.5 and 86.3 ± 8.5 min (p = 0.178). Results presented here do not reveal differences in potency labelling between ONA and INCO, even when the full range of therapeutic doses are examined, although there was a trend towards stronger INCO effects. Data confirm previous reports on identical potency labelling of ONA and INCO. The MDA seems to be an appropriate instrument to test the potency labelling of other BT drugs as well, including new BT drugs currently under development.

Citing Articles

Botulinum toxin therapy in Parkinson disease-related lower limb dystonia. An 8 year retrospective review.

Schonwald A, Amodeo K, Levy V, Danisi F Clin Park Relat Disord. 2025; 11():100260.

PMID: 39777306 PMC: 11704551. DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2024.100260.


Nonsurgical treatment for upper eyelid retraction in patients with inactive Graves' orbitopathy.

Vokurka Topljak S, Galiot Delic M, Mandic K, Peric S, Baretic M, Mandic J Int Ophthalmol. 2023; 43(7):2291-2299.

PMID: 36587368 PMC: 9805617. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02625-7.


Analgesic potential of different available commercial brands of botulinum neurotoxin-A in formalin-induced orofacial pain in mice.

Cunha T, Gontijo Couto A, Januzzi E, Rosa Ferraz Goncalves R, Silva G, Silva C Toxicon X. 2021; 12:100083.

PMID: 34527897 PMC: 8429966. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100083.


Consensus guidelines for botulinum toxin therapy: general algorithms and dosing tables for dystonia and spasticity.

Dressler D, Altavista M, Altenmueller E, Bhidayasiri R, Bohlega S, Chana P J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021; 128(3):321-335.

PMID: 33635442 PMC: 7969540. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-021-02312-4.


Botulinum toxin dosing in arm muscles: contextual factors.

Dressler D, Kopp B, Adib Saberi F J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021; 128(3):315-319.

PMID: 33515332 PMC: 7969489. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-021-02307-1.


References
1.
Dressler D . Routine use of Xeomin in patients previously treated with Botox: long term results. Eur J Neurol. 2009; 16 Suppl 2:2-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02877.x. View

2.
RUSSELL W . The medical geography of air pollution. J R Soc Med. 1993; 86(8):494-5. PMC: 1294077. View

3.
Marion M, Sheehy M, Sangla S, Soulayrol S . Dose standardisation of botulinum toxin. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995; 59(1):102-3. PMC: 1073616. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.59.1.102. View

4.
Roggenkamper P, Jost W, Bihari K, Comes G, Grafe S . Efficacy and safety of a new Botulinum Toxin Type A free of complexing proteins in the treatment of blepharospasm. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2005; 113(3):303-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-005-0323-3. View

5.
Pearce L, Borodic G, First E, MacCallum R . Measurement of botulinum toxin activity: evaluation of the lethality assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994; 128(1):69-77. DOI: 10.1006/taap.1994.1181. View