The Prognostic Value of Immune Factors in the Tumor Microenvironment of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The host's immune system plays a pivotal role in many tumor types, including squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). We aim to identify immunological prognosticators for lymph node metastases (LNM) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in penile SCC. For this retrospective observational cohort study, penile SCC patients ( = 213) treated in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, were selected if sufficient formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor material was available. Analysis included previously described high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) status, immunohistochemical scores for classical and non-classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, and novel data on tumor-infiltrating macrophages and cytotoxic an regulatory T-cells. Clinicopathological characteristics and extended follow-up were also included. Regression analyses investigated relationships of the immune parameters with LNM and DSS. In the total cohort, diffuse PD-L1 tumor-cell expression, CD163 macrophage infiltration, non-classical HLA class I upregulation, and low stromal CD8 T-cell infiltration were all associated with LNM. In the multivariable model, only tumor PD-L1 expression remained a significant predictor for LNM (odds ratio (OR) 2.8, = 0.05). hrHPV negativity and diffuse PD-L1 tumor-cell expression were significantly associated with poor DSS and remained so upon correction for clinical parameters [hazard ratio (HR) 9.7, < 0.01 and HR 2.8, = 0.03]. The only immune factor with different expression in HPV and HPV tumors was PD-L1, with higher PD-L1 expression in the latter ( = 0.03). In the HPV cohort ( = 158), LNM were associated with diffuse PD-L1 tumor-cell expression, high intratumoral CD163 macrophage infiltration, and low number of stromal CD8 T-cells. The first two parameters were also linked to DSS. In the multivariable regression model, diffuse PD-L1 expression remained significantly unfavorable for DSS (HR 5.0, < 0.01). These results emphasize the complexity of the tumor microenvironment in penile cancer and point toward several possible immunotherapy targets. Here described immune factors can aid risk-stratification and should be evaluated in clinical immunotherapy studies to ultimately lead to patient tailored treatment.
Immunotherapy in the Management of Penile Cancer-A Systematic Review.
Taghizadeh H, Fajkovic H Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).
PMID: 40075730 PMC: 11898862. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050883.
Treatment strategies in human papillomavirus-related advanced penile cancer.
Longoni M, Fankhauser C, Negri F, Salonia A, Basile G, Johnstone P Nat Rev Urol. 2025; .
PMID: 39966660 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-025-00994-z.
Guimaraes S, Vale A, Rocha M, Butarelli A, da Silva J, de Deus A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1463445.
PMID: 39493451 PMC: 11527599. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1463445.
Relationship between NLR and penile squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Babadi S, Shahri M, Foroughi Nematollahi S, Barpujari A, Clark A, Lucke-Wold B BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):194.
PMID: 39243079 PMC: 11378456. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01569-7.
Exploring the Multifactorial Landscape of Penile Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk Factors.
Amicuzi U, Grillo M, Stizzo M, Olivetta M, Tammaro S, Napolitano L Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).
PMID: 39202278 PMC: 11353487. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161790.