» Articles » PMID: 29939986

Visual Attention is Not Deployed at the Endpoint of Averaging Saccades

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Jun 26
PMID 29939986
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The premotor theory of attention postulates that spatial attention arises from the activation of saccade areas and that the deployment of attention is the consequence of motor programming. Yet attentional and oculomotor processes have been shown to be dissociable at the neuronal level in covert attention tasks. To investigate a potential dissociation at the behavioral level, we instructed human participants to move their eyes (saccade) towards 1 of 2 nearby, competing saccade targets. The spatial distribution of visual attention was determined using oriented visual stimuli presented either at the target locations, between them, or at several other equidistant locations. Results demonstrate that accurate saccades towards one of the targets were associated with presaccadic enhancement of visual sensitivity at the respective saccade endpoint compared to the nonsaccaded target location. In contrast, averaging saccades, landing between the 2 targets, were not associated with attentional facilitation at the saccade endpoint. Rather, attention before averaging saccades was equally deployed at the 2 target locations. Taken together, our results reveal that visual attention is not obligatorily coupled to the endpoint of a subsequent saccade. Rather, our results suggest that the oculomotor program depends on the state of attentional selection before saccade onset and that saccade averaging arises from unresolved attentional selection.

Citing Articles

Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices.

Goldstein A, Stanford T, Salinas E Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39495217 PMC: 11534328. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97883.


Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field.

Ramezanpour H, Kehoe D, Schall J, Fallah M J Neurosci. 2024; 44(46).

PMID: 39353728 PMC: 11561864. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0635-24.2024.


Signal switching may enhance processing power of the brain.

Groh J, Schmehl M, Caruso V, Tokdar S Trends Cogn Sci. 2024; 28(7):600-613.

PMID: 38763804 PMC: 11793079. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.04.008.


Coupling of saccade plans to endogenous attention during urgent choices.

Goldstein A, Stanford T, Salinas E bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38496491 PMC: 10942325. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.01.583058.


Pre-saccadic shifts of attention in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Lehet M, Rolfs M, Bao J, Fattal J, Thakkar K Brain Behav. 2024; 14(3):e3466.

PMID: 38450916 PMC: 10918725. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3466.


References
1.
Itti L, Koch C . Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(3):194-203. DOI: 10.1038/35058500. View

2.
Vishwanath D, Kowler E . Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared. Vision Res. 2003; 43(15):1637-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00168-8. View

3.
Coeffe C, ORegan J . Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: predictability and latency effects. Vision Res. 1987; 27(2):227-40. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90185-4. View

4.
Ottes F, Van Gisbergen J, Eggermont J . Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Res. 1985; 25(6):849-62. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90193-2. View

5.
Katnani H, Gandhi N . Order of operations for decoding superior colliculus activity for saccade generation. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(3):1250-9. PMC: 3174826. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00265.2011. View