» Articles » PMID: 29930240

Effects of Prosthetic Material and Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2018 Jun 23
PMID 29930240
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of prosthetic material and framework design on the stress within dental implants and peripheral bone using finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIAL AND METHODS A mandibular implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with different prosthetic materials [cobalt-chromium-supported ceramic (C), zirconia-supported ceramic (Z), and zirconia-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate (ZRPMMA)-supported resin (ZP)] and different connector widths (2, 3, and 4 mm) within the framework were used to evaluate stress via FEA under oblique loading conditions. Maximum principal (smax), minimum principal (smin), and von Mises (svM) stress values were obtained. RESULTS Minimum stress values were observed in the model with a 2-mm connector width for C and ZP. The models with 3-mm and 4-mm connector widths showed higher stress values than the model with a 2-mm connector width for C (48-50%) and ZP (50-52%). Similar stress values were observed in the 3- and 4-mm models. There was no significant difference in the amount of stress with Z regardless of connector width. The Z and ZP models showed similar stress values in the 3- and 4-mm models and higher stress values than in the C model. Z, ZP, and C showed the highest stress values for the model with a 2-mm connector width. CONCLUSIONS Changes in the material and width of connectors may influence stress on cortical bone, cancellous bone, and implants. C was associated with the lowest stress values. Higher maximum and minimum principal stress values were seen in cortical bone compared to cancellous bone.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Different Connector Designs for All-Ceramic Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.

Alberto L, Kalluri L, Esquivel-Upshaw J, Duan Y Unknown. 2025; 5(1):34-43.

PMID: 39749100 PMC: 11694178. DOI: 10.3390/ceramics5010004.


Comparing the influence of cuspal angulation, occlusal loading, and connector widths between tooth- and implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.

Chander N, Reddy D Med J Armed Forces India. 2024; 80(4):442-448.

PMID: 39071759 PMC: 11280270. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.10.004.


[Stress in an implant-supported unitary fixed partial prosthesis with different materials in the first lower premolar through finite elements].

Mendez A, Coronado H Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 11(1):e140.

PMID: 38288318 PMC: 10810070. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1101-2023-140.


Automated Remodelling of Connectors in Fixed Partial Dentures.

Jemaa H, Eisenburger M, Greuling A Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 37999016 PMC: 10669984. DOI: 10.3390/dj11110252.


Mechanical and Biological Characterization of PMMA/AlO Composites for Dental Implant Abutments.

Roato I, Genova T, Duraccio D, Ruffinatti F, Zanin Venturini D, Di Maro M Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37571080 PMC: 10421041. DOI: 10.3390/polym15153186.


References
1.
Akay C, Yalug S . Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 21:604-11. PMC: 4350528. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.892680. View

2.
Meric G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Eser A, Ozden A . Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011; 70(1):61-71. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2011.597775. View

3.
Mokhtarikhoee S, Jannesari A, Behroozi H, Mokhtarikhoee S . Effect of connector width on stress distribution in all ceramic fixed partial dentures (a 3D finite element study). Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2008:1829-32. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649535. View

4.
Skalak R . Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49(6):843-8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-x. View

5.
Oh W, Gotzen N, Anusavice K . Influence of connector design on fracture probability of ceramic fixed-partial dentures. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(9):623-7. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100909. View