» Articles » PMID: 29929182

Long-term Evaluation of Community Health Promotion: Using Capacity Building As an Intermediate Outcome Measure

Overview
Journal Public Health
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29929182
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Between 2001 and 2012, the health authority of Hamburg-Eimsbüttel carried out a health promotion programme for children and their parents in a disadvantaged neighbourhood called Lenzsiedlung. The programme consisted of different action fields aiming at sustainable establishment of community capacities.

Study Design: The research goal was the long-term assessment of community capacities with a newly developed instrument 'KEQ' (KEQ = Kapazitätsentwicklung im Quartier/capacity building in small areas/neighbourhoods). Practitioners and researchers wanted to know whether community capacities could be increased, which changes occurred during the programme and whether processes of capacity building could be maintained. Research results were also used for the continuous adjustment of the programme to community needs.

Methods: Three surveys on community capacities were conducted (t1: June 2006 [including a retrospective measurement of t0: 2001]; t2: June 2008; and t3: November 2011), each directed to 40-60 stakeholders of the Lenzsiedlung. The instrument consists of five domains (participation, local leadership, available resources, networking and cooperation and health care) with a total of 51 items.

Results: For the community capacities, we found a positive trend from 2001 to 2006 supported by data from a documentary analysis over the same period of time. Then, 2006-2011 was a phase of consolidation with only slight improvements (e.g. in the particularly important domain 'health care').

Conclusions: The results show the feasibility of a community health promotion programme and its maintenance over a period of 10 years. However, Lenzgesund was not the sole programme in the neighbourhood during the period of observation, so that not all improvements in capacities are directly assignable to the interventions. The instrument mainly reflects the possibly one-sided perspective of the interviewed experts from the community.

Citing Articles

The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review.

Weber P, Birkholz L, Straub R, Kohler S, Helsper N, Dippon L Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024; 22(2):165-179.

PMID: 38190019 PMC: 10864521. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y.


Contextual effects of community capacity as a predictor for adolescent alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use: A multi-level analysis.

Birgel V, Roding D, Reder M, Soellner R, Walter U SSM Popul Health. 2023; 24:101521.

PMID: 37790085 PMC: 10543175. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101521.


Community capacity for prevention and health promotion: a scoping review on underlying domains and assessment methods.

Birgel V, Decker L, Roding D, Walter U Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):147.

PMID: 37608344 PMC: 10464111. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02314-1.


Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10-A Study Protocol.

Till M, Abu-Omar K, Herbert-Maul A, Fleuren T, Reimers A, Ziemainz H Front Public Health. 2022; 10:837982.

PMID: 35493370 PMC: 9046678. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837982.


Evaluating the Social Marketing Success Criteria in Health Promotion: A F-DEMATEL Approach.

Liao C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(17).

PMID: 32877995 PMC: 7503311. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176317.