» Articles » PMID: 32877995

Evaluating the Social Marketing Success Criteria in Health Promotion: A F-DEMATEL Approach

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Sep 4
PMID 32877995
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Health promotion campaigns are used to raise awareness about health issues with the purpose of improving health outcomes and community wellbeing. They are important for increasing community awareness of health behavior changes. In the application of health promotion, social marketing can be used to influence changes in individual behavior. Social marketing encourages the social behavioral change of the target audience. This social behavioral change refers to the behavior of a certain number of target audiences, not just individual behavior. This research identified various social marketing success criteria to improve the performance of health promotion using decision-making method. Fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (F-DEMATEL) is a structural causal relation method that has been verified effectual in congregating the viewpoints of professionals and thus providing information of greater reliability in various areas. F-DEMATEL method helps to identify the core problems and direction of improvement in complex systems by quantifying the degree to which criteria attributes interact with each other. This research applied F-DEMATEL to evaluate the complex interrelation success criteria of social marketing in order to effectively implement health promotion. Several effective criteria were derived from this research. These influential criteria are "Designing effective Communication message", "Meeting the needs of beneficiaries", "Providing more benefit than cost", "Marketing mix elements", "Customer orientation", "Organizational advantage" and "Market selection". The practitioner must consider the needs of the recipients to accomplish a successful social marketing campaign in health promotion. Moreover, the practitioner also has to design an attractive message and marketing mix strategy to communicate the benefits of the behavioral change to the target audience. Besides, the message delivered by the known organization increases the success of social marketing in promoting healthy lifestyle. This study provides important information for the non-profit organization about selecting the significant criteria to lead to the success of the campaign.

Citing Articles

Exploring perceived learning effectiveness in virtual reality health communication through the lens of construal level theory.

Liao C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2348.

PMID: 39210293 PMC: 11360774. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19827-6.


Beyond the basics: Exploring the impact of social media marketing enablers on business success.

Singh P Heliyon. 2024; 10(5):e26435.

PMID: 38434279 PMC: 10904253. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26435.


Exploring determinants of formation of cognitive anchors from altruistic messages: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach.

Liao C, Hsu C PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293841.

PMID: 37930993 PMC: 10627445. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293841.


Does antibiotic awareness campaigns exposure decrease intention to demand antibiotic treatment? Testing a structural model among parents in Western Australia.

Alejandro A, Leo W, Bruce M, Gimutao K PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285396.

PMID: 37200317 PMC: 10194918. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285396.


Effectiveness of Prevention Interventions Using Social Marketing Methods on Behavioural Change in the General Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Roger A, Dourgoudian M, Mergey V, Laplanche D, Ecarnot F, Sanchez S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901585 PMC: 10002445. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054576.


References
1.
Bruss G, Gruenberg A, Goldstein R, Barber J . Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Interview guide: joint interview and test-retest methods for interrater reliability. Psychiatry Res. 1994; 53(2):191-202. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90110-4. View

2.
Purcarea V . The impact of marketing strategies in healthcare systems. J Med Life. 2019; 12(2):93-96. PMC: 6685306. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2019-1003. View

3.
Aras R . Social marketing in healthcare. Australas Med J. 2013; 4(8):418-24. PMC: 3562881. DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.626. View

4.
Chiu C, Hu J, Lo Y, Chang E . Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Interventions for the Elderly: A Scoping Review from 2015-2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15). PMC: 7432678. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155335. View

5.
Ali A, Katz D . Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: How Integrative Medicine Fits. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(5 Suppl 3):S230-40. PMC: 4615581. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.019. View