» Articles » PMID: 29928598

The Relationship Between Clinical Insight and Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Schizophrenia

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29928598
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is often associated with poor clinical insight (unawareness of mental illness and its symptoms) and deficits in empathy, which are important for social functioning. Cognitive empathy has been linked to clinical insight while affective empathy and its role in insight and pathology have received mixed evidence.

Methods: Instruments assessing symptomatology (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; PANSS), clinical insight (Scales to assess awareness of mental disorders; SUMD), and cognitive and affective empathy were administered to 22 participants with first episode and chronic schizophrenia and 21 healthy controls. Self-report, parent-report, and performance based measures were used to assess cognitive and affective empathy (The interpersonal reactivity index; IRI/Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test/Faux Pas) to reduce bias and parse shared variance.

Results: Age of onset, gender, and symptomatology emerged as significant predictors of poor clinical insight. Additionally, the fantasy subscale of the IRI as reported by parents emerged as a positive predictor while the personal distress (parent report) subscale emerged as a negative predictor of awareness into mental illness. There were significant differences on performance-based measures of empathy between the control and schizophrenia groups.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that affective empathy is relatively intact across phases of illness whereas cognitive empathy abilities are compromised and could be targets for psychotherapy intervention.

Citing Articles

No Sex-based Differences in Self-reported Empathy between Patients with Schizophrenia and Control Subjects.

Saracco-Alvarez R, Robles-Garcia R, Flores-Medina Y, Olivares-Neumann J, Tovilla-Zarate C, Alcala-Lozano R Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024; 52(5):670-677.

PMID: 39403904 PMC: 11475054. DOI: 10.62641/aep.v52i5.1784.


Empathic disequilibrium as a new framework for understanding individual differences in psychopathology.

Shalev I, Eran A, Uzefovsky F Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1153447.

PMID: 37275732 PMC: 10236526. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153447.


Emotion regulation and delusion-proneness relate to empathetic tendencies in a transdiagnostic sample.

Herms E, Bolbecker A, Wisner K Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:992757.

PMID: 36226099 PMC: 9548608. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.992757.


General description of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and assessment tools in Lebanon: A scoping review.

Haddad C, Salameh P, Sacre H, Clement J, Calvet B Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021; 25:100199.

PMID: 34094889 PMC: 8163972. DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100199.


Empathic disequilibrium in two different measures of empathy predicts autism traits in neurotypical population.

Shalev I, Uzefovsky F Mol Autism. 2020; 11(1):59.

PMID: 32660537 PMC: 7359469. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-020-00362-1.


References
1.
Abu-Akel A, Bailey A . The possibility of different forms of theory of mind impairment in psychiatric and developmental disorders. Psychol Med. 2000; 30(3):735-8. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291799002123. View

2.
Langdon R, Ward P . Taking the perspective of the other contributes to awareness of illness in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008; 35(5):1003-11. PMC: 2728812. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn039. View

3.
Green M, Hellemann G, Horan W, Lee J, Wynn J . From perception to functional outcome in schizophrenia: modeling the role of ability and motivation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69(12):1216-24. PMC: 3976993. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.652. View

4.
Pousa E, Duno R, Brebion G, David A, Ruiz A, Obiols J . Theory of mind deficits in chronic schizophrenia: evidence for state dependence. Psychiatry Res. 2008; 158(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.05.018. View

5.
Gallagher Dr S, Meltzoff A . The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philos Psychol. 2013; 9(2). PMC: 3845406. DOI: 10.1080/09515089608573181. View