» Articles » PMID: 29926209

Aberrant Intervertebral Motion in Patients with Treatment-resistant Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Retrospective Cohort Study and Control Comparison

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29926209
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intervertebral kinematic assessments have been used to investigate mechanical causes when back pain is resistant to treatment, and recent studies have identified intervertebral motion markers that discriminate patients from controls. However, such patients are a heterogeneous group, some of whom have structural disruption, but the effects of this on intervertebral kinematics are unknown.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with treatment-resistant back pain referred for quantitative fluoroscopy were matched to an equal number of pain-free controls for age and sex. All received passive recumbent flexion assessments for intervertebral motion sharing inequality (MSI), variability (MSV), laxity and translation. Comparisons were made between patient subgroups, between patients and controls and against normative levels from a separate group of controls.

Results: Eleven patients had had surgical or interventional procedures, and ten had spondylolisthesis or pars defects. Sixteen had no disruption. Patients had significantly higher median MSI values (0.30) than controls (0.27, p = 0.010), but not MSV (patients 0.08 vs controls 0.08, p = 0.791). Patients who received invasive procedures had higher median MSI values (0.37) than those with bony defects (0.30, p = 0.018) or no disruption (0.28, p = 0.0007). Laxity and translation above reference limits were not more prevalent in patients.

Conclusion: Patients with treatment-resistant nonspecific back pain have greater MSI values than controls, especially if the former have received spinal surgery. However, excessive laxity, translation and MSV are not more prevalent in these patients. Thus, MSI should be investigated as a pain mechanism and for its possible value as a prognostic factor and/or target for treatment in larger patient populations. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Citing Articles

Passive intervertebral restraint is different in patients with treatment-resistant chronic nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.

Breen A, Nematimoez M, Branney J, Breen A Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(6):2405-2419.

PMID: 38730057 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08249-y.


A Reference Database of Standardised Continuous Lumbar Intervertebral Motion Analysis for Conducting Patient-Specific Comparisons.

Breen A, De Carvalho D, Funabashi M, Kawchuk G, Page I, Wong A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:745837.

PMID: 34646820 PMC: 8503612. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.745837.


Influence of Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level on Immediate Post-Spinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Response in an Animal Model.

Lima C, Martins D, Avatapally S, Cho M, Li P, Reed W Brain Sci. 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34439641 PMC: 8393701. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11081022.


Investigator analytic repeatability of two new intervertebral motion biomarkers for chronic, nonspecific low back pain in a cohort of healthy controls.

To D, Breen A, Breen A, Mior S, Howarth S Chiropr Man Therap. 2020; 28(1):62.

PMID: 33228737 PMC: 7685540. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-00350-5.


Assessment of Lumbar Lordosis Distribution with a Novel Mathematical Approach and Its Adaptation for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Sandor Z, Rathonyi G, Dinya E Comput Math Methods Med. 2020; 2020:7312125.

PMID: 32377225 PMC: 7180428. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7312125.


References
1.
Zanjani-Pour S, Meakin J, Breen A, Breen A . Estimation of in vivo inter-vertebral loading during motion using fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance image informed finite element models. J Biomech. 2017; 70:134-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.025. View

2.
Saragiotto B, Maher C, Yamato T, Costa L, Menezes Costa L, Ostelo R . Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (1):CD012004. PMC: 8761501. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012004. View

3.
Tsang S, Szeto G, Li L, Wong D, Yip M, Lee R . The effects of bending speed on the lumbo-pelvic kinematics and movement pattern during forward bending in people with and without low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):157. PMC: 5392990. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1515-3. View

4.
Hancock M, Maher C, Laslett M, Hay E, Koes B . Discussion paper: what happened to the 'bio' in the bio-psycho-social model of low back pain?. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(12):2105-10. PMC: 3229745. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1886-3. View

5.
Oxland T . Fundamental biomechanics of the spine--What we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J Biomech. 2015; 49(6):817-832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.035. View