» Articles » PMID: 17367798

The Dynamic Flexion/extension Properties of the Lumbar Spine in Vitro Using a Novel Pendulum System

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2007 Mar 21
PMID 17367798
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The biomechanical properties of the ligamentous cadaver spine have been previously examined using a variety of experimental testing protocols. Ongoing technical challenges in the biomechanical testing of the spine include the application of physiologic compressive loads and the application of dynamic bending moments while allowing unconstrained three-dimensional motion. The purpose of this study was to report the development of a novel pendulum apparatus that addressed these challenges and to determine the effects of various axial compressive loads on the dynamic biomechanical properties of the lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU). Lumbar FSUs were tested in flexion and extension under five axial compressive loads chosen to represent physiologic loading conditions. After an initial rotation, the FSUs behaved as a dynamic, underdamped vibrating elastic system. Bending stiffness and coefficient of damping increased significantly as the compressive pendulum load increased. The apparatus described herein is a relatively simple approach to determining the dynamic bending properties of the FSU, and potentially disc arthroplasty devices. It is capable of applying physiologic compressive loads at dynamic rates without constraining the kinematics of the joints, crucial requirements for testing FSUs in vitro.

Citing Articles

Identification of a lumped-parameter model of the intervertebral joint from experimental data.

Gould S, Davico G, Palanca M, Viceconti M, Cristofolini L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1304334.

PMID: 39104629 PMC: 11298350. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1304334.


Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time?.

Newman H, Moore A, Meadows K, Hilliard R, Boyes M, Vresilovic E JOR Spine. 2024; 7(2):e1322.

PMID: 38666074 PMC: 11045045. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1322.


Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence.

Costi J, Ledet E, OConnell G JOR Spine. 2021; 4(1):e1138.

PMID: 33778410 PMC: 7984003. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1138.


Aberrant intervertebral motion in patients with treatment-resistant nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.

Breen A, Mellor F, Breen A Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(11):2831-2839.

PMID: 29926209 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5666-1.


Real-time visualization of joint cavitation.

Kawchuk G, Fryer J, Jaremko J, Zeng H, Rowe L, Thompson R PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0119470.

PMID: 25875374 PMC: 4398549. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119470.