» Articles » PMID: 29915483

Anastomotic Failure in Colorectal Surgery: Where Are We At?

Overview
Journal Indian J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29915483
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) can be a devastating complication in colorectal surgery. While it is less frequent in the modern era, it still results in significant morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and increases the costs and demands on health services. There is inevitable interplay between patient physiology and technical factors that predispose a patient to AL. Obesity, preoperative total proteins, male gender, ongoing anticoagulant treatment, intraoperative complication and number of hospital beds have been identified as independent risk factors. This has led to an online risk calculator for AL. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have also been implicated, but no significant evidence has yet been found to support causation. In addition, technical factors such as type of anastomosis, mechanical bowel preparation, drains, omentoplasty and faecal diversion have failed to show significant differences in AL rates. Early diagnosis and intervention in AL is essential in reducing the rates of morbidity and mortality. Clinical assessment has high sensitivity but low specificity and should be used in combination with imaging techniques to get a diagnosis. C-reactive protein is also a useful marker. The management will depend on the grade of AL and the clinical state of the patient. Management options include conservative measures such as antibiotics and/or percutaneous drainage to more invasion procedures such as open drainage and/or Hartmann's procedure. In conclusion, ALs will forever pose challenges to the surgeon in diagnosis and management. It is often the yardstick by which each surgeon is measured and is the source of significant morbidity to patients and health care services worldwide. As a result, a low threshold for investigation and intervention is mandatory to ensure better outcomes and lower overall mortality and morbidity.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Stoma Closure: A Retrospective Study in Tertiary Hospitals in Yemen.

Al-Shehari M, Obadiel Y, Abdulwahab M, Jowah H Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75407.

PMID: 39781140 PMC: 11710879. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75407.


Development of an Anisotropic Hyperelastic Material Model for Porcine Colorectal Tissues.

Fahmy Y, Trabia M, Ward B, Gallup L, Froehlich M Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38247941 PMC: 10813287. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010064.


Reconstruction, oversewing, or taking the anastomosis down - which surgical intervention is most potent in the treatment of anastomotic leaks following colorectal resections?.

El-Ahmar M, Koch F, Ristig M, Lehmann K, Ritz J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):266.

PMID: 37405509 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02986-2.


Left hemicolectomy and low anterior resection in colorectal cancer patients: Knight-griffen vs. transanal purse-string suture anastomosis with no-coil placement.

Ammendola M, Filice F, Battaglia C, Romano R, Manti F, Minici R Front Surg. 2023; 10:1093347.

PMID: 37139187 PMC: 10149919. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1093347.


No Coil® placement in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy and low anterior resection for colorectal cancer.

Ammendola M, Ruggiero M, Talarico C, Memeo R, Ammerata G, Capomolla A World J Surg Oncol. 2020; 18(1):327.

PMID: 33302970 PMC: 7731543. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02096-z.

References
1.
Dietz U, Debus E . Intestinal anastomoses prior to 1882; a legacy of ingenuity, persistence, and research form a foundation for modern gastrointestinal surgery. World J Surg. 2005; 29(3):396-401. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7720-x. View

2.
Yeh C, Changchien C, Wang J, Chen J, Chen H, Chiang J . Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg. 2004; 241(1):9-13. PMC: 1356840. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a. View

3.
Beard J, Nicholson M, Sayers R, Lloyd D, Everson N . Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1990; 77(10):1095-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800771006. View

4.
Choy P, Bissett I, Docherty J, Parry B, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A . Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (9):CD004320. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3. View

5.
Jesus E, Karliczek A, Matos D, Castro A, Atallah A . Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (4):CD002100. PMC: 8437749. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002100.pub2. View