» Articles » PMID: 29914484

Comparative Impact of Two Continuing Education Activities Targeted at COPD Educators on Educational Outcomes: Protocol for a Non-randomized Controlled Study Using Mixed Methods

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29914484
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Therapeutic patient education (TPE) improves quality of life and reduces health care utilization among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, benefits from TPE might depend on the performance of the educators and training is needed to ensure the effective delivery of TPE interventions. Based on the framework by Moore et al. (J Contin Educ Health Prof 29:1-15, 2009), we will compare the impact of two continuing education (CE) activities on TPE in regard to the following educational outcomes: (1) learning, (2) self-report of competence, (3) performance of the educators, and (4) outcomes of COPD patients who will meet the newly trained educators for TPE.

Methods: We will conduct a non-randomized controlled study using mixed methods. Educators will first participate in a CE activity on TPE that will include a role-playing simulation (experimental group) or in a lecture on TPE (comparison group) and then will perform TPE in COPD patients. Among educators, we will assess: (1) learning, by measuring knowledge about TPE, and (2) self-report of competence using self-administered questionnaires before and after the activity. Then, after the CE activity, we will assess (3) educators' performance levels in delivering TPE by rating a videotaped TPE intervention. In COPD patients who will meet the newly trained educators for TPE after either CE activity, we will assess (4) quality of life and resource utilization using interviewer-administered questionnaires, before and after TPE. Statistical analyses will compare the experimental group against the comparison group using multivariate models. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we will conduct interviews with educators and perform content analysis. Results will be integrated in order that qualitative results further explain the quantitative ones.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first controlled mixed methods study to compare the impact of two CE activities on TPE in regard to four educational outcomes. We believe this study will serve as a model for evaluating CE activities on TPE. Results from this study could increase educators' performance levels in delivering effective TPE interventions, and, in turn, COPD patient outcomes.

Trial Registration: The study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ( NCT02870998 ) on March 15, 2016.

Citing Articles

COPD-Specific Self-Management Support Provided by Trained Educators in Everyday Practice is Associated with Improved Quality of Life, Health-Directed Behaviors, and Skill and Technique Acquisition: A Convergent Embedded Mixed-Methods Study.

Gagne M, Lauzier S, Babineau-Therrien J, Hamel C, Penney S, Bourbeau J Patient. 2019; 13(1):103-119.

PMID: 31502238 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00386-7.

References
1.
Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Gotzsche P, Altman D, Mann H, Berlin J . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:e7586. PMC: 3541470. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7586. View

2.
Murray M, Stacey D, Wilson K, OConnor A . Skills training to support patients considering place of end-of-life care: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Care. 2010; 26(2):112-21. View

3.
Francke A, Garssen B, Abu-Saad H . Determinants of changes in nurses' behaviour after continuing education: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 1995; 21(2):371-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02536.x. View

4.
Dahmen G, Rochon J, Konig I, Ziegler A . Sample size calculations for controlled clinical trials using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Methods Inf Med. 2005; 43(5):451-6. View

5.
Kon S, Canavan J, Jones S, M Nolan C, Clark A, Dickson M . Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2(3):195-203. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70001-3. View