» Articles » PMID: 29912677

Does the Sequence of Rotations in Multiple Mini Interview Stations Influence the Candidates' Performance?

Overview
Journal Med Educ Online
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2018 Jun 19
PMID 29912677
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs), the candidates start out with different stations depending on the sequence of rotation they are assigned; thus, their perceived difficulty level and nervousness with their first station may differ. We examined whether such differences influenced the candidates' overall performance in the MMI. A 32-item questionnaire was developed and administered to candidates for admission interviews at a medical school regarding their perceptions of the MMI. Candidates' interview scores were also obtained and were compared across groups who differed in the sequence of rotation of MMI stations. Candidates felt nervous when they encountered the first station, which did not differ regardless of which station was their first encounter. Candidates were neutral regarding whether their first station was more difficult than the others and about whether its difficulty level influenced their overall performance in the test. Although candidates' perceived station difficulty differed across stations, there were no differences in their performance in each station between those it was their first station and those it was not. Candidates' total interview scores also did not differ across groups of different sequence of rotations. The MMI is a fair process as it does not give disadvantage to those who encounter a more difficult station than others for their first station.

Citing Articles

Employing Multiple Mini Interviews in Selection Processes for Psychology Professional Training Programs: Ten Tips for Effective Implementation.

Oxlad M, Roberts R, Chur-Hansen A, Proeve M, Auton J, Sarris A MedEdPublish (2016). 2023; 9:192.

PMID: 38073773 PMC: 10699392. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2020.000192.1.


Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology.

Burgos L, de Lima A, Parodi J, Costabel J, Ganiele M, Durante E J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020; 8(1):25-31.

PMID: 32039270 PMC: 6946944. DOI: 10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116.

References
1.
Eva K, Reiter H, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood T, Norman G . Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA. 2012; 308(21):2233-40. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.36914. View

2.
Rees E, Hawarden A, Dent G, Hays R, Bates J, Hassell A . Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37. Med Teach. 2016; 38(5):443-55. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799. View

3.
Sullivan G, Artino Jr A . Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 5(4):541-2. PMC: 3886444. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. View

4.
Jerant A, Griffin E, Rainwater J, Henderson M, Sousa F, Bertakis K . Does applicant personality influence multiple mini-interview performance and medical school acceptance offers?. Acad Med. 2012; 87(9):1250-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826102ad. View

5.
Urlings-Strop L, Stijnen T, Themmen A, Splinter T . Selection of medical students: a controlled experiment. Med Educ. 2009; 43(2):175-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03267.x. View