» Articles » PMID: 29907250

Evaluating Risk Factors for Differences in Fibroid Size and Number Using a Large Electronic Health Record Population

Overview
Journal Maturitas
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 Jun 17
PMID 29907250
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate individual characteristics of women with fibroids in relation to fibroid size and number.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 2302 women (black and white, age range 18-87) with image- or surgery-confirmed fibroids from the Synthetic Derivative, a database of de-identified demographic and clinical information from patient electronic health records (EHRs) from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We performed multivariate regression analyses on the following outcomes: volume of largest fibroid, largest dimension of all fibroids, and number of fibroids (single vs multiple). Candidate risk factors included age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), race, type 2 diabetes status, and number of living children (a proxy for parity). We assessed potential effect measure modification by race and both age and BMI using a likelihood ratio test.

Results: Black race was strongly associated with having multiple fibroids (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49, 2.24) and larger fibroid volume (adjusted beta: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38, 2.27) and greater largest dimension (adjusted beta: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.38). Having multiple fibroids was most strongly associated with ages 43-47 (aOR = 3.37, 95% CI: 2.55, 4.46) compared with the youngest age group (ages 18-36). Having a larger number of living children was associated with having single a fibroid (aOR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.99).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that different underlying etiologies are involved for women developing single versus multiple fibroids and small versus large fibroids. Studies are needed of the mechanisms by which these characteristics influence fibroid formation and growth.

Citing Articles

Uterine fibroids and longitudinal profiles of the vaginal microbiota in a cohort presenting for transvaginal ultrasound.

Robbins S, Brown S, Stennett C, Tuddenham S, Johnston E, Wnorowski A PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0296346.

PMID: 38315688 PMC: 10843103. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296346.


Uterine Weight as a Modifier of Black/White Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Among Veterans with Fibroids in the Veterans Health Administration.

Carey C, Katon J, Bossick A, Gray K, Doll K, Christy A Health Equity. 2023; 6(1):909-916.

PMID: 36636115 PMC: 9811843. DOI: 10.1089/heq.2022.0130.


Uterine Fibroids in Black Women: A Race-Stratified Subgroup Analysis of Treatment Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation.

Berman J, Bradley L, Hawkins S, Levy B J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 31(4):593-599.

PMID: 34287028 PMC: 9063135. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.9001.

References
1.
Velez Edwards D, Baird D, Hartmann K . Association of age at menarche with increasing number of fibroids in a cohort of women who underwent standardized ultrasound assessment. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178(3):426-33. PMC: 3727338. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws585. View

2.
Parazzini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Chatenoud L, Ricci E, Guarnerio P . Reproductive factors and risk of uterine fibroids. Epidemiology. 1996; 7(4):440-2. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199607000-00018. View

3.
Morton C . Genetic approaches to the study of uterine leiomyomata. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108 Suppl 5:775-8. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s5775. View

4.
Dandolu V, Singh R, Lidicker J, Harmanli O . BMI and uterine size: is there any relationship?. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010; 29(6):568-71. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181e8ae64. View

5.
. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2001; 894:i-xii, 1-253. View