» Articles » PMID: 29905829

Two Hormones for One Receptor: Evolution, Biochemistry, Actions, and Pathophysiology of LH and HCG

Overview
Journal Endocr Rev
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2018 Jun 16
PMID 29905829
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

LH and chorionic gonadotropin (CG) are glycoproteins fundamental to sexual development and reproduction. Because they act on the same receptor (LHCGR), the general consensus has been that LH and human CG (hCG) are equivalent. However, separate evolution of LHβ and hCGβ subunits occurred in primates, resulting in two molecules sharing ~85% identity and regulating different physiological events. Pituitary, pulsatile LH production results in an ~90-minute half-life molecule targeting the gonads to regulate gametogenesis and androgen synthesis. Trophoblast hCG, the "pregnancy hormone," exists in several isoforms and glycosylation variants with long half-lives (hours) and angiogenic potential and acts on luteinized ovarian cells as progestational. The different molecular features of LH and hCG lead to hormone-specific LHCGR binding and intracellular signaling cascades. In ovarian cells, LH action is preferentially exerted through kinases, phosphorylated extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 (pERK1/2) and phosphorylated AKT (also known as protein kinase B), resulting in irreplaceable proliferative/antiapoptotic signals and partial agonism on progesterone production in vitro. In contrast, hCG displays notable cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA)-mediated steroidogenic and proapoptotic potential, which is masked by estrogen action in vivo. In vitro data have been confirmed by a large data set from assisted reproduction, because the steroidogenic potential of hCG positively affects the number of retrieved oocytes, and LH affects the pregnancy rate (per oocyte number). Leydig cell in vitro exposure to hCG results in qualitatively similar cAMP/PKA and pERK1/2 activation compared with LH and testosterone. The supposed equivalence of LH and hCG has been disproved by such data, highlighting their sex-specific functions and thus deeming it an oversight caused by incomplete understanding of clinical data.

Citing Articles

Pharmacogenomic of LH and its receptor: are we ready for clinical practice?.

Conforti A, Di Girolamo R, Guida M, Alviggi C, Casarini L Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(Suppl 1):29.

PMID: 40001128 PMC: 11863420. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01359-2.


The role of LH in follicle development: from physiology to new clinical implications.

Longo M, Liuzzi F, De Carlini S, La Marca A Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(Suppl 1):22.

PMID: 39930391 PMC: 11808943. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01353-8.


Evaluating the impact of gene polymorphism on polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive meta-analysis and power assessment.

Thomas S, Veerabathiran R J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024; 25(4):207-218.

PMID: 39658874 PMC: 11632634. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2024-6-10.


A Therapeutic Proposal for Mini-Puberty in Male Infants with Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism: A Retrospective Case Series.

Mesas-Arostegui M, Hita-Contreras F, Lopez-Siguero J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598127 PMC: 11595084. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226983.


Myo-Inositol and Its Derivatives: Their Roles in the Challenges of Infertility.

Placidi M, Casoli G, Tatone C, Emidio G, Bevilacqua A Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596891 PMC: 11592302. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110936.