» Articles » PMID: 29905058

[Application of Second Sacral Alar-iliac Screw Technique for Reconstruction of Spinopelvic Stability]

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To summarize the current research progress of second sacral alar-iliac (S AI) screw technique for reconstruction of spinopelvic stability.

Methods: The recent original literature concerning development, clinical applications, anatomy, imageology, and biomechanics of S AI screw technique in reconstruction of spinopelvic stability was reviewed and analyzed.

Results: As a common clinical strategy for the reconstruction of spinopelvic stability, S AI screws achieve satisfactory effectiveness of lumbosacral fixation without complications which were found during the application of traditional iliac screws technique. S AI screw technique is more difficult to place screws by hand because of its narrow screw trajectory. Although the S AI screws trajectory pass through 3 layers of bone cortex, the biomechanical cadaveric study demonstrate that no statistical difference in stiffness was found between the traditional iliac and S AI screw in a spinopelvic fixation model.

Conclusion: S AI screw technique should be a safe and feasible method for reconstruction of spinopelvic stability in place of the traditional iliac screw technique.

References
1.
Kim Y, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Cho K, Edwards 2nd C, Rinella A . Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(4):721-8. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00550. View

2.
Mazur M, Ravindra V, Schmidt M, Brodke D, Lawrence B, Riva-Cambrin J . Unplanned reoperation after lumbopelvic fixation with S-2 alar-iliac screws or iliac bolts. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 23(1):67-76. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14541. View

3.
Ishida W, Elder B, Holmes C, Lo S, Goodwin C, Kosztowski T . Comparison Between S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Fixation and Iliac Screw Fixation in Adult Deformity Surgery: Reoperation Rates and Spinopelvic Parameters. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(7):672-680. PMC: 5624376. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217700111. View

4.
Bridwell K, Edwards 2nd C, Lenke L . The pros and cons to saving the L5-S1 motion segment in a long scoliosis fusion construct. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(20):S234-42. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092462.45111.27. View

5.
Tis J, Helgeson M, Lehman R, Dmitriev A . A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(24):E866-72. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bf94f0. View