» Articles » PMID: 19910754

A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Types of Lumbopelvic Fixation

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 Nov 14
PMID 19910754
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Comparative biomechanical testing in calf spines.

Objective: To biomechanically evaluate 4 techniques of lumbosacral fixation.

Summary Of Background Data: Pelvic fixation is a problematic area, and currently, the preferred method of pelvic fixation is controversial. Clinically, iliac screws have demonstrated decreased rod breakage rates, and better correction of pelvic obliquity than unthreaded rods (Galveston technique), but several modern methods of iliac fixation have not been compared.

Methods: A total of 32 male calf spines were tested under axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending. Following intact testing, specimens were instrumented in the following groups: group 1-Modified Galveston technique with rods connected directly to iliac screws (no S1 fixation); group 2-S1 screws and iliac screws with offset connectors distal to S1; group 3-S1 screws and iliac screws with offset connectors coupled to the longitudinal rod between L6 and S1; and group 4-S1 and S2 screws without iliac fixation. Pedicle screws were placed from L3 to L6. Following nondestructive testing, specimens were fixed at the cephalad aspect of the construct and flexed to failure, with peak failure moment (Nm).

Results: Group 1 demonstrated significantly more flexion/extension than groups 2, 3, 4 (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups for lateral bending or axial rotation at L3-S1 or L6-S1. During destructive testing, group 4 showed a significant reduction in peak failure compared to group 1 (P<0.001), group 2 (P=0.001), and group 3 (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups 1, 2, and 3 and all specimens failed at the distal fixation.

Conclusion: With extension of instrumentation across the lumbosacral junction, our results indicate significant improvement in stability with the use of S1 screws and iliac screw fixation. Furthermore, there does not appear to be any significant difference in the location of the connector for the iliac screw.

Citing Articles

Anatomic trajectory for iliac screw placement adapts better to the morphological features of the pelvis of each individual than the S2 alar iliac screw: a radiological study.

Alvarez Galovich L, Bordon J, Blanco I, Peiro A, Mengis C, Pinera A Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023; 165(9):2607-2614.

PMID: 37458861 PMC: 10477215. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05692-6.


The posterior superior iliac rim screw as an adjunct to pelvic fixation in complex spinopelvic stabilization.

Joo P, Grauer J N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 8:100094.

PMID: 35141658 PMC: 8820036. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100094.


Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for "H"- and "U"-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study.

Peng Y, Zhang G, Zhang S, Ji X, Li J, Du C J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):428.

PMID: 34217358 PMC: 8254325. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02581-5.


A Modified Triangular Osteosynthesis Protocol for the Rod and Pedicle Screw Fixation of Vertical Unstable Sacral Fractures.

Tian D, Guo X, Liu N, Wang B, He H, Xiong M Int J Spine Surg. 2021; 15(3):485-493.

PMID: 33985998 PMC: 8176822. DOI: 10.14444/8070.


Augmented Reality Navigated Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screw Insertion.

Dennler C, Safa N, Bauer D, Wanivenhaus F, Liebmann F, Gotschi T Int J Spine Surg. 2021; 15(1):161-168.

PMID: 33900970 PMC: 7931709. DOI: 10.14444/8021.