Economic Evaluations of EHealth Technologies: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2018 Jun 14

PMID 29897921

Citations 36

Authors

Chiranjeev Sanyal

Paul Stolee

Don Juzwishin

Don Husereau

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Innovations in eHealth technologies have the potential to help older adults live independently, maintain their quality of life, and to reduce their health system dependency and health care expenditure. The objective of this study was to systematically review and appraise the quality of cost-effectiveness or utility studies assessing eHealth technologies in study populations involving older adults.

Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, NHS EED, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2000 to 2016 that examined cost-effectiveness (or utility) of eHealth technologies. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement.

Results: Eleven full text articles met the inclusion criteria representing public and private health care systems. eHealth technologies evaluated by these studies includes computerized decision support system, a web-based physical activity intervention, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy, telecare, and telehealth. Overall, the reporting quality of the studies included in the review was varied. Most studies demonstrated efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an intervention using a randomized control trial and statistical modeling, respectively. This review found limited information on the feasibility of adopting these technologies based on economic and organizational factors.

Conclusions: This review identified few economic evaluations of eHealth technologies that included older adults. The quality of the current evidence is limited and further research is warranted to clearly demonstrate the long-term cost-effectiveness of eHealth technologies from the health care system and societal perspectives.

Citing Articles

Use and impact of digital technology in supporting health providers deliver care in low- and low-middle-income countries: A systematic review protocol.

Craig A, Lawford H, Miller M, Chen-Cao L, Woods L, Liaw S PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0319190.

PMID: 39982931 PMC: 11845030. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319190.

Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

Inchingolo F, Inchingolo A, Fatone M, Avantario P, Del Vecchio G, Pezzolla C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928909 PMC: 11203333. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060662.

Clinical Validation of Digital Healthcare Solutions: State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities.

Gomis-Pastor M, Berdun J, Borras-Santos A, de Dios Lopez A, Fernandez-Montells Rama B, Garcia-Esquirol O Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 38891132 PMC: 11171879. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111057.

Telehealth Consultation for Malaysian Citizens' Willingness to Pay Assessed by the Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Method.

Mey T, Ogasawara K Malays J Med Sci. 2024; 31(1):91-102.

PMID: 38456119 PMC: 10917602. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.1.8.

Characteristics and Range of Reviews About Technologies for Aging in Place: Scoping Review of Reviews.

Bergschold J, Gunnes M, Eide A, Lassemo E JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e50286.

PMID: 38252472 PMC: 10845034. DOI: 10.2196/50286.

References

Jodar-Sanchez F, Ortega F, Parra C, Gomez-Suarez C, Bonachela P, Leal S . Cost-utility analysis of a telehealth programme for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with long-term oxygen therapy. J Telemed Telecare. 2014; 20(6):307-16. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X14544421. View

Cleveringa F, Welsing P, van den Donk M, Gorter K, Niessen L, Rutten G . Cost-effectiveness of the diabetes care protocol, a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention that reduces cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Care. 2009; 33(2):258-63. PMC: 2809259. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1232. View

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

Barnett T, Chumbler N, Vogel W, Beyth R, Ryan P, Figueroa S . The cost-utility of a care coordination/home telehealth programme for veterans with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2007; 13(6):318-21. DOI: 10.1258/135763307781644843. View

Alvarez R . The promise of e-Health - a Canadian perspective. eHealth Int. 2002; 1(1):4. PMC: 135525. DOI: 10.1186/1476-3591-1-4. View

Cui Y, Doupe M, Katz A, Nyhof P, Forget E . Economic evaluation of Manitoba Health Lines in the management of congestive heart failure. Healthc Policy. 2013; 9(2):36-50. PMC: 3999537. View

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D . Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BJOG. 2013; 120(6):765-70. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12241. View

Bryan S, Mitton C, Donaldson C . Breaking the addiction to technology adoption. Health Econ. 2014; 23(4):379-83. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3034. View

Titov N, Dear B, Ali S, Zou J, Lorian C, Johnston L . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for older adults with symptoms of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2015; 46(2):193-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.09.008. View

10.

Dixon P, Hollinghurst S, Ara R, Edwards L, Foster A, Salisbury C . Cost-effectiveness modelling of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from a cohort simulation conducted alongside the Healthlines randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(9):e012355. PMC: 5051382. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012355. View

11.

Henshall C, Schuller T . Health technology assessment, value-based decision making, and innovation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013; 29(4):353-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462313000378. View

12.

Peels D, Hoogenveen R, Feenstra T, Golsteijn R, Bolman C, Mudde A . Long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention among people aged over fifty: modelling the results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:1099. PMC: 4221676. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1099. View

13.

Boyne J, van Asselt A, Gorgels A, Steuten L, De Weerd G, Kragten J . Cost-effectiveness analysis of telemonitoring versus usual care in patients with heart failure: the TEHAF-study. J Telemed Telecare. 2013; 19(5):242-8. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X13495478. View

14.

Dear B, Zou J, Ali S, Lorian C, Johnston L, Sheehan J . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for older adults with symptoms of anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Ther. 2015; 46(2):206-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.09.007. View

15.

Dixon P, Hollinghurst S, Edwards L, Thomas C, Gaunt D, Foster A . Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(8):e012352. PMC: 5013404. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012352. View

16.

Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandez J, Beecham J, Hirani S, Beynon M . Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing. 2014; 43(6):794-800. PMC: 4204660. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu067. View

17.

Husereau D, Henshall C, Jivraj J . Adaptive approaches to licensing, health technology assessment, and introduction of drugs and devices. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014; 30(3):241-9. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462314000191. View