» Articles » PMID: 27566642

Cost-effectiveness of Telehealth for Patients with Raised Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Evidence from the Healthlines Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Aug 28
PMID 27566642
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention for primary care patients with raised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Design: A prospective within-trial patient-level economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Patients recruited through primary care, and intervention delivered via telehealth service.

Participants: Adults with a 10-year CVD risk ≥20%, as measured by the QRISK2 algorithm, with at least 1 modifiable risk factor.

Intervention: A series of up to 13 scripted, theory-led telehealth encounters with healthcare advisors, who supported participants to make behaviour change, use online resources, optimise medication and improve adherence. Participants in the control arm received usual care.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Cost-effectiveness measured by net monetary benefit at the end of 12 months of follow-up, calculated from incremental cost and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Productivity impacts, participant out-of-pocket expenditure and the clinical outcome were presented in a cost-consequences framework.

Results: 641 participants were randomised-325 to receive the telehealth intervention in addition to usual care and 316 to receive only usual care. 18% of participants had missing data on either costs, utilities or both. Multiple imputation was used for the base case results. The intervention was associated with incremental mean per-patient National Health Service (NHS) costs of £138 (95% CI 66 to 211) and an incremental QALY gain of 0.012 (95% CI -0.001 to 0.026). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £10 859. Net monetary benefit at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 per QALY was £116 (95% CI -58 to 291), and the probability that the intervention was cost-effective at this threshold value was 0.77. Similar results were obtained from a complete case analysis.

Conclusions: There is evidence to suggest that the Healthlines telehealth intervention was likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN27508731; Results. Prospectively registered 05 July 2012.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review.

Abedinejad M, Hadian M, Behrooj S, Bagheri Faradonbeh S, Saniee N Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025; 38():103.

PMID: 39781317 PMC: 11707721. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.38.103.


Telemedicine in Cardiology: Enhancing Access to Care and Improving Patient Outcomes.

Tolu-Akinnawo O, Ezekwueme F, Awoyemi T Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62852.

PMID: 38912070 PMC: 11192510. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62852.


Economics of Team-Based Care for Blood Pressure Control: Updated Community Guide Systematic Review.

Jacob V, Reynolds J, Chattopadhyay S, Nowak K, Hopkins D, Fulmer E Am J Prev Med. 2023; 65(4):735-754.

PMID: 37121447 PMC: 10527860. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.013.


Cost-effectiveness of Digital Tools for Behavior Change Interventions Among People With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.

Kyaw T, Ng N, Theocharaki M, Wennberg P, Sahlen K Interact J Med Res. 2023; 12:e42396.

PMID: 36795470 PMC: 9982716. DOI: 10.2196/42396.


Perspective: Telehealth - beyond legislation and regulation.

Al-Alawy K, Moonesar I SAGE Open Med. 2023; 11:20503121221143223.

PMID: 36643207 PMC: 9834783. DOI: 10.1177/20503121221143223.


References
1.
Thomas C, Man M, OCathain A, Hollinghurst S, Large S, Edwards L . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials. Trials. 2014; 15:36. PMC: 3906859. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-36. View

2.
Mihaylova B, Briggs A, OHagan A, Thompson S . Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs. Health Econ. 2010; 20(8):897-916. PMC: 3470917. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1653. View

3.
Bergmo T . How to Measure Costs and Benefits of eHealth Interventions: An Overview of Methods and Frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(11):e254. PMC: 4642791. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4521. View

4.
Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M . Cost of cardiovascular diseases in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2006; 92(10):1384-9. PMC: 1861058. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072173. View

5.
White I, Royston P, Wood A . Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011; 30(4):377-99. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4067. View