» Articles » PMID: 29892390

Effect of Relaxation-dependent Adhesion on Pre-sliding Response of Cartilage

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 13
PMID 29892390
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Possible links between adhesive properties and the pre-sliding (static) friction response of cartilage are not fully understood in the literature. The aims of this study are to investigate the relation between adhesion and relaxation time in articular cartilage, and the effect of relaxation-dependent adhesion on the pre-sliding response of cartilage. Adhesion tests were performed to evaluate the work of adhesion of cartilage at different relaxation times. Friction tests were conducted to identify the pre-sliding friction response of cartilage at relaxation times corresponding to adhesion tests. The pre-sliding friction response of cartilage was systematically linked to the work of adhesion and contact conditions by a slip-based failure model. It was found that the work of adhesion increases with relaxation time. Also, the work of adhesion is linearly correlated to the resistance to slip-based failure. In addition, as the work of adhesion increases, the adhered (stick) area at the moment of failure increases, and the propagation rate of the annular slip (crack) area towards its centre increases. These findings offer a mechanistic explanation of the pre-sliding friction behaviour and stick-slip response of soft hydrated interfaces such as articular cartilage and hydrogels. In addition, the linear correlation between adhesion and threshold to slip-based failure enables estimation of the adhesive strength of such interfaces directly from the pre-sliding friction response (e.g. shear wave elastography).

Citing Articles

Minimum design requirements for a poroelastic mimic of articular cartilage.

Tan W, Moore A, Stevens M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022; 137:105528.

PMID: 36343521 PMC: 7615484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105528.


Microindentation of cartilage before and after articular loading in a bioreactor: assessment of length-scale dependency using two analysis methods.

Yuh C, OBryan C, Angelini T, Wimmer M Exp Mech. 2022; 61(7):1069-1080.

PMID: 35528779 PMC: 9075500. DOI: 10.1007/s11340-021-00742-5.


A High-Throughput Mechanical Activator for Cartilage Engineering Enables Rapid Screening of in vitro Response of Tissue Models to Physiological and Supra-Physiological Loads.

Capuana E, Marino D, Di Gesu R, La Carrubba V, Brucato V, Tuan R Cells Tissues Organs. 2021; 211(6):670-688.

PMID: 34261061 PMC: 9843549. DOI: 10.1159/000514985.


Relaxation capacity of cartilage is a critical factor in rate- and integrity-dependent fracture.

Han G, Chowdhury U, Eriten M, Henak C Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):9527.

PMID: 33947908 PMC: 8096812. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88942-w.


Immature bovine cartilage wear by fatigue failure and delamination.

Durney K, Shaeffer C, Zimmerman B, Nims R, Oungoulian S, Jones B J Biomech. 2020; 107:109852.

PMID: 32517855 PMC: 7809915. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109852.

References
1.
Park S, Costa K, Ateshian G . Microscale frictional response of bovine articular cartilage from atomic force microscopy. J Biomech. 2004; 37(11):1679-87. PMC: 2809665. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.017. View

2.
Swann D, BLOCH K, Swindell D, Shore E . The lubricating activity of human synovial fluids. Arthritis Rheum. 1984; 27(5):552-6. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780270511. View

3.
Radin E, Swann D, Weisser P . Separation of a hyaluronate-free lubricating fraction from synovial fluid. Nature. 1970; 228(5269):377-8. DOI: 10.1038/228377a0. View

4.
Maroudas A, Wachtel E, Grushko G, KATZ E, Weinberg P . The effect of osmotic and mechanical pressures on water partitioning in articular cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991; 1073(2):285-94. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(91)90133-2. View

5.
Chan S, Neu C, Komvopoulos K, Reddi A . The role of lubricant entrapment at biological interfaces: reduction of friction and adhesion in articular cartilage. J Biomech. 2011; 44(11):2015-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.015. View