» Articles » PMID: 29892325

Comparison of the Stability of Mandibular Sagittal Osteotomy Fixation Between Two Types of Titanium Miniplates: A Biomechanical Study in Sheep Mandibles

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Jun 13
PMID 29892325
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of the fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy of the ramus by two types of titanium miniplates in sheep mandibles. Seven preserved sheep mandibles with similar weight and size were selected, dissected with complete removal of soft-tissue structures, and sectioned in their midline. After performing sagittal split osteotomy, 5 mm of advancement was standardized and samples were divided into two groups according to the type of titanium miniplate (GI = seven hemimandibles were fixed with straight titanium miniplate, GII = seven hemimandibles were fixed with L-shaped titanium miniplates), and then subjected to compressive load. The means (standard deviation) of the compressive load and extension values were 70.68 N (22.26) and 63.36 mm (15.60) to straight miniplates, and 78.80 N (32.54) and 70.55 mm (5.42) to L-shaped miniplates. After comparison and statistical analysis, the results showed no significant difference between the two types of titanium miniplates.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Comparison of WE43-Based Magnesium vs. Titanium Miniplates in a Mandible Fracture Model in Sheep.

Fischer H, Schmidt-Bleek O, Orassi V, Wulsten D, Schmidt-Bleek K, Heiland M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(1).

PMID: 36614440 PMC: 9821048. DOI: 10.3390/ma16010102.

References
1.
Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M . A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(3):452-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.017. View

2.
Ochs M . Bicortical screw stabilization of sagittal split osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61(12):1477-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.07.003. View

3.
Bouwman J, Tuinzing D, Kostense P . A comparative in vitro study on fixation of sagittal split osteotomies with Würzburg screws, Champy miniplates, and Biofix (biodegradable) rods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 23(1):46-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80327-3. View

4.
Murphy M, Haug R, Barber J . An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55(5):489-94; discussion 494-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90699-6. View

5.
Harada K, Watanabe M, Ohkura K, Enomoto S . Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58(4):370-3; discussion 373-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90913-3. View