» Articles » PMID: 29881951

Food-Related Contact Dermatitis, Contact Urticaria, and Atopy Patch Test with Food

Overview
Date 2018 Jun 9
PMID 29881951
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A wide variety of foods may cause or aggravate skin diseases such as contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, or atopic dermatitis (AD), both in occupational and private settings. The mechanism of action underlying allergic disease to food, food additives, and spices may be immunologic and non-immunologic. The classification and understanding of these reactions is a complex field, and knowledge of the possible reaction patterns and appropriate diagnostic test methods is essential. In addition, certain foods may cause worsening of atopic dermatitis lesions in children. The atopy patch test (APT) is a well-established, clinically useful tool for assessing delayed type reactions to protein allergens in patients and may be useful to detect protein allergens relevant for certain skin diseases. The APT may even detect sensitization against allergens in intrinsic atopic dermatitis patients, who show negative skin prick test and negative in vitro IgE test results against these allergens. Native foods, SPT solutions on filter paper, and purified allergens in petrolatum have been used for APT. The European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) has worked on standardizing this test in the context of AD patients, who are allergic to aeroallergens and food. This recommended, standardized technique involves test application at the upper back of children and adults; use of large, 12-mm Finn chambers; avoidance of any pre-treatment such as tape stripping or delipidation; standardized amounts of purified allergens in petrolatum; and use of the standardized ETFAD reading key. The APT may not be the best working or best standardized of all possible skin tests, but it is the best test that we currently have available in this niche.

Citing Articles

Is Food-Triggered Atopic Dermatitis a Form of Systemic Contact Dermatitis?.

Ahuja K, Issa C, Nedorost S, A Lio P Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2024; 66(1):1-13.

PMID: 38285165 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-023-08977-x.


Diagnostic accuracy of atopy patch test in children with cow's milk allergy.

Kulalert P, Pongcharoen P, Sritipsukho P, Intraakhao S, Piriyanon P, Thaweekul P Clin Mol Allergy. 2023; 21(1):2.

PMID: 37029394 PMC: 10080736. DOI: 10.1186/s12948-023-00183-6.


Contact Urticaria Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review.

Gimenez-Arnau A, Pesque D, Maibach H Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022; 11(4):194-201.

PMID: 36415744 PMC: 9672538. DOI: 10.1007/s13671-022-00379-0.


Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergy: A Complex Interplay What We Know and What We Would Like to Learn.

Papapostolou N, Xepapadaki P, Gregoriou S, Makris M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35887996 PMC: 9317394. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144232.


Hand Dermatitis Secondary to Exposure to Butternut Squash.

Shah M, Feldman S Case Rep Dermatol. 2022; 14(2):123-126.

PMID: 35813838 PMC: 9210002. DOI: 10.1159/000524930.


References
1.
Janssens V, Morren M, Degreef H . Protein contact dermatitis: myth or reality?. Br J Dermatol. 1995; 132(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb08616.x. View

2.
Kanerva L . Occupational protein contact dermatitis and paronychia from natural rubber latex. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2001; 14(6):504-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00175.x. View

3.
Weidinger S, Novak N . Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2015; 387(10023):1109-1122. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00149-X. View

4.
Mitchell J, Jordan W . Allergic contact dermatitis from the radish, Raphanus sativus. Br J Dermatol. 1974; 91(2):183-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1974.tb15864.x. View

5.
Scheman A, Gupta S . Photoallergic contact dermatitis from diallyl disulfide. Contact Dermatitis. 2001; 45(3):179. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.045003179.x. View