» Articles » PMID: 29875393

Identifying Differentially Expressed Proteins in Sorghum Cell Cultures Exposed to Osmotic Stress

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 8
PMID 29875393
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drought stress triggers remarkable physiological changes and growth impediments, which significantly diminish plant biomass and crop yield. However, certain plant species show notable resilience, maintaining nearly normal yields under severe water deficits. For example, sorghum is a naturally drought-tolerant crop, which is ideal for studying plant adaptive responses to drought. Here we used sorbitol treatments to simulate drought-induced osmotic stress in sorghum cell suspension cultures and analysed fractions enriched for extracellular matrix proteins using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification technology. Sorbitol induced an overall increase in protein secretion, with putative redox proteins, proteases, and glycosyl hydrolases featuring prominently among the responsive proteins. Gene expression analysis of selected candidates revealed regulation at the transcriptional level. There was a notable differential gene expression between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive sorghum varieties for some of the candidates. This study shows that protein secretion is a major component of the sorghum response to osmotic stress. Additionally, our data provide candidate genes, which may have putative functions in sorghum drought tolerance, and offer a pool of genes that could be developed as potential biomarkers for rapid identification of drought tolerant lines in plant breeding programs.

Citing Articles

Expression profiles of phytosulfokine signalling components in sorghum drought stress-adaptive response.

Goche T, Ngara R, Chivasa S MicroPubl Biol. 2025; 2025.

PMID: 39944964 PMC: 11815484. DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.001284.


Regulation of Proline Accumulation and Protein Secretion in Sorghum under Combined Osmotic and Heat Stress.

Ngwenya S, Moloi S, Shargie N, Brown A, Chivasa S, Ngara R Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999714 PMC: 11244414. DOI: 10.3390/plants13131874.


Association between Reactive Oxygen Species, Transcription Factors, and Candidate Genes in Drought-Resistant Sorghum.

Liu J, Wang X, Wu H, Zhu Y, Ahmad I, Dong G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(12).

PMID: 38928168 PMC: 11203540. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126464.


SbMYC2 mediates jasmonic acid signaling to improve drought tolerance via directly activating SbGR1 in sorghum.

Wang G, Long Y, Jin X, Yang Z, Dai L, Yang Y Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(3):72.

PMID: 38446239 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04578-0.


Exogenous abscisic acid treatment regulates protein secretion in sorghum cell suspension cultures.

Muthego D, Moloi S, Brown A, Goche T, Chivasa S, Ngara R Plant Signal Behav. 2023; 18(1):2291618.

PMID: 38100609 PMC: 10730228. DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2291618.


References
1.
Park S, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen D, Fujii H, Zhao Y . Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science. 2009; 324(5930):1068-71. PMC: 2827199. DOI: 10.1126/science.1173041. View

2.
Chivasa S, Slabas A . Plant extracellular ATP signalling: new insight from proteomics. Mol Biosyst. 2011; 8(2):445-52. DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05278k. View

3.
Jedmowski C, Ashoub A, Beckhaus T, Berberich T, Karas M, Bruggemann W . Comparative Analysis of Sorghum bicolor Proteome in Response to Drought Stress and following Recovery. Int J Proteomics. 2014; 2014:395905. PMC: 4198819. DOI: 10.1155/2014/395905. View

4.
Okamoto M, Peterson F, Defries A, Park S, Endo A, Nambara E . Activation of dimeric ABA receptors elicits guard cell closure, ABA-regulated gene expression, and drought tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(29):12132-7. PMC: 3718107. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305919110. View

5.
Ndimba B, Chivasa S, Simon W, Slabas A . Identification of Arabidopsis salt and osmotic stress responsive proteins using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2005; 5(16):4185-96. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401282. View