» Articles » PMID: 29869148

Attending to Scalar Ethical Issues in Emerging Approaches to Environmental Health Research and Practice

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2018 Jun 6
PMID 29869148
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accelerated changes to the planet have created novel spaces to re-imagine the boundaries and foci of environmental health research. Climate change, mass species extinction, ocean acidification, biogeochemical disturbance, and other emergent environmental issues have precipitated new population health perspectives, including, but not limited to, one health, ecohealth, and planetary health. These perspectives, while nuanced, all attempt to reconcile broad global challenges with localized health impacts by attending to the reciprocal relationships between the health of ecosystems, animals, and humans. While such innovation is to be encouraged, we argue that a more comprehensive engagement with the ethics of these emerging fields of inquiry will add value in terms of the significance and impact of associated interventions. In this contribution, we highlight how the concept of spatial and temporal scale can be usefully deployed to shed light on a variety of ethical issues common to emerging environmental health perspectives, and that the potential of scalar analysis implicit to van Potter's conceptualization of bioethics has yet to be fully appreciated. Specifically, we identify how scale interacts with key ethical issues that require consideration and clarification by one health, ecohealth, and planetary health researchers and practitioners to enhance the effectiveness of research and practice, including justice and governance.

Citing Articles

Toward Planetary Health Ethics? Refiguring Bios in Bioethics.

Anderson W J Bioeth Inq. 2023; 20(4):695-702.

PMID: 37624544 PMC: 10943140. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10285-0.


Sustaining planetary health through systems thinking: Public health's critical role.

Iyer H, DeVille N, Stoddard O, Cole J, Myers S, Li H SSM Popul Health. 2021; 15:100844.

PMID: 34179331 PMC: 8213960. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100844.


Transdisciplinary Research Priorities for Human and Planetary Health in the Context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Ebi K, Harris F, Sioen G, Wannous C, Anyamba A, Bi P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23).

PMID: 33265908 PMC: 7729495. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238890.


Guest Editorial.

Lederman Z, Degeling C Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019; 37(1-2):1-3.

PMID: 31520342 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-019-00096-8.


Does clinical ethics need a Land Ethic?.

Wardrope A Med Health Care Philos. 2019; 22(4):531-543.

PMID: 31016461 PMC: 6842387. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-019-09890-x.

References
1.
POTTER V, Potter L . Global bioethics: converting sustainable development to global survival. Med Glob Surviv. 1995; 2(3):185-91. View

2.
Lee L . A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics. Am J Bioeth. 2017; 17(9):5-12. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164. View

3.
Cotton R, Cohen A . Eco-conservation and healthcare ethics: a call to action. Laryngoscope. 2009; 120(1):4-8. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20663. View

4.
Lysaght T, Capps B, Bailey M, Bickford D, Coker R, Lederman Z . Justice Is the Missing Link in One Health: Results of a Mixed Methods Study in an Urban City State. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0170967. PMC: 5271361. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170967. View

5.
Whitehouse P . The rebirth of bioethics: extending the original formulations of Van Rensselaer Potter. Am J Bioeth. 2004; 3(4):W26-W31. DOI: 10.1162/152651603322614751. View