Global Bioethics: Converting Sustainable Development to Global Survival
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Millions of people in various parts of the world and within each country are presently surviving in categories described as "mere," "miserable," "idealistic," "irresponsible," and "acceptable." The term "acceptable survival" is proposed as a bioethical goal of global survival, looking beyond the 21st century to the year 3000 and beyond. The frequently used alternative term is "sustainable development," but in most contexts this is an economic concept and does not imply any moral or ethical constraints, except where these are spelled out. Acceptable survival, broadly defined, means acceptable to a universal sense of what is morally right and good and what will continue in the long term. The expanding dominant, but irresponsible, world culture is not an acceptable type of development because it cannot survive in the long term.
Samuel G, Richie C J Med Ethics. 2022; 49(6):428-433.
PMID: 35922120 PMC: 10313991. DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108489.
Bio-Ethics and One Health: A Case Study Approach to Building Reflexive Governance.
Boudreau LeBlanc A, Williams-Jones B, Aenishaenslin C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:648593.
PMID: 35372246 PMC: 8971560. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.648593.
Towards a feminist global ethics.
Tong R Glob Bioeth. 2022; 33(1):14-31.
PMID: 35185324 PMC: 8856019. DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2021.2011002.
Buse C, Smith M, Silva D Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018; 37(1-2):4-21.
PMID: 29869148 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-018-0080-3.
Cultural context and consent: an anthropological view.
Neves M Med Health Care Philos. 2004; 7(1):93-8.
PMID: 15139259 DOI: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000021678.07382.74.