» Articles » PMID: 29845400

Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29845400
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The health care reform initiative led by the Hong Kong government's Food and Health Bureau has started the implementation of an electronic sharing platform to provide an information infrastructure that enables public hospitals and private clinics to share their electronic medical records (EMRs) for improved access to patients' health care information. However, previous attempts to convince the private clinics to adopt EMRs to document health information have faced challenges, as the EMR adoption has been voluntary. The lack of electronic data shared by private clinics carries direct impacts to the efficacy of electronic record sharing between public and private healthcare providers. To increase the likelihood of buy-in, it is essential to proactively identify the users' and organizations' needs and capabilities before large-scale implementation. As part of the reform initiative, this study examined factors affecting the adoption of EMRs in small or solo private general practice clinics, by analyzing the experiences and opinions of the physicians and clinical assistants during the pilot implementation of the technology, with the purpose to learn from it before full-scale rollout. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 physicians and clinical assistants from seven small or solo private general practice clinics to evaluate their experiences, expectations, and opinions regarding the deployment of EMRs. Interview transcripts were content analyzed to identify key factors. Factors affecting the adoption of EMRs to record and manage health care information were identified as follows: system interface design; system functions; stability and reliability of hardware, software, and computing networks; financial and time costs; task and outcome performance, work practice, and clinical workflow; physical space in clinics; trust in technology; users' information technology literacy; training and technical support; and social and organizational influences. The factors are interrelated with the others. The adoption factors identified are multifaceted, ranging from technological characteristics, clinician-technology interactions, skills and knowledge, and the user-workflow-technology fit. Other findings, which have been relatively underrepresented in previous studies, contribute unique insights about the influence of work and social environment on the adoption of EMRs, including limited clinic space and the effects of physicians' decision to use the technology on clinical staffs' adoption decisions. Potential strategies to address the concerns, overcome adoption barriers, and define relevant policies are discussed.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators of the electronic medical record adoption among healthcare providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Bekele T, Gezie L, Willems H, Metzger J, Abere B, Seyoum B Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241301946.

PMID: 39659403 PMC: 11629419. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241301946.


The feasibility of integrating an alcohol screening clinical decision support tool into primary care clinical software: a review and Australian key stakeholder study.

Canaway R, Dai L, Hallinan C, Caddy C, Hegarty K, Boyle D BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):408.

PMID: 39623299 PMC: 11610076. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02662-4.


The impact of limited access to digital health records on doctors and their willingness to adopt electronic health record systems.

Bouh M, Hossain F, Paul P, Rahman M, Islam R, Nakashima N Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241281626.

PMID: 39323430 PMC: 11423383. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241281626.


The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.

Keuper J, van Tuyl L, de Geit E, Rijpkema C, Vis E, Batenburg R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1099.

PMID: 39300456 PMC: 11414290. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.


The impact of county-level factors on meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) among primary care providers.

Alexandre P, Monestime J, Alexandre K PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0295435.

PMID: 38271332 PMC: 10810449. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295435.


References
1.
Iakovidis I . Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe. Int J Med Inform. 1998; 52(1-3):105-15. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00129-4. View

2.
Sittig D, Singh H . Eight rights of safe electronic health record use. JAMA. 2009; 302(10):1111-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1311. View

3.
Or C, Tao D . Usability study of a computer-based self-management system for older adults with chronic diseases. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013; 1(2):e13. PMC: 3626148. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.2184. View

4.
Ford E, Menachemi N, Phillips M . Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless?. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 13(1):106-12. PMC: 1380189. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1913. View

5.
Ludwick D, Doucette J . Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 78(1):22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.005. View