Barriers to the Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records by Physicians from Systematic Review to Taxonomy and Interventions

Overview

Journal BMC Health Serv Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2010 Aug 10

PMID 20691097

Citations 230

Authors

Albert Boonstra

Manda Broekhuis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options.

Methods: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information.

Results: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers.

Conclusions: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined.

Citing Articles

An exploratory study of electronic medical record implementation and recordkeeping culture: the case of hospitals in Indonesia.

Hossain M, Sutanto J, Handayani P, Haryanto A, Bhowmik J, Frings-Hessami V BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):249.

PMID: 39953485 PMC: 11827342. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12399-0.

A qualitative exploration of the early adoption of an electronic medical record system for type 1 diabetes management in Rwanda.

Bille N, Christensen D, Byberg S, Gishoma C, Villadsen S, Calopietro M Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076241311057.

PMID: 39801577 PMC: 11719426. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241311057.

Impact of Digitalization in Dentistry on Technostress, Mental Health, and Job Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study.

Bernburg M, Gebhardt J, Groneberg D, Mache S Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791679 PMC: 11719768. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010072.

Barriers and facilitators of the electronic medical record adoption among healthcare providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Bekele T, Gezie L, Willems H, Metzger J, Abere B, Seyoum B Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241301946.

PMID: 39659403 PMC: 11629419. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241301946.

Development and pre-evaluation of a "DiagNurse" mobile app to support nurses in clinical diagnosis using the ADDIE model.

Nowicki G, Mazurek W, Waskowicz A, Kowalczyk E, Koziol J, Milosz M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29765.

PMID: 39613888 PMC: 11607312. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81813-0.

References

Kemper A, Uren R, Clark S . Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1):e20-4. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3000. View

Jha A, Bates D, Jenter C, Orav E, Zheng J, Cleary P . Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 15(1):158-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x. View

Valdes I, Kibbe D, Tolleson G, Kunik M, Petersen L . Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care. 2004; 12(1):3-9. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v12i1.102. View

Menachemi N, Langley A, Brooks R . The use of information technologies among rural and urban physicians in Florida. J Med Syst. 2007; 31(6):483-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-007-9088-6. View

Vishwanath A, Scamurra S . Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Health Informatics J. 2007; 13(2):119-34. DOI: 10.1177/1460458207076468. View

Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P . Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 77(5):291-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. View

McLane S . Designing an EMR planning process based on staff attitudes toward and opinions about computers in healthcare. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005; 23(2):85-92. DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200503000-00008. View

Pizziferri L, Kittler A, Volk L, Honour M, Gupta S, Wang S . Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005; 38(3):176-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009. View

Anderson J . Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 76(5-6):480-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016. View

10.

Randeree E . Exploring physician adoption of EMRs: a multi-case analysis. J Med Syst. 2007; 31(6):489-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-007-9089-5. View

11.

Earnest M, Ross S, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Lin C . Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(5):410-7. PMC: 516248. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1479. View

12.

Miller R, Sim I . Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004; 23(2):116-26. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116. View

13.

Meade B, Buckley D, Boland M . What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs?. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(8):551-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.004. View

14.

Yamamoto L, Khan A . Challenges of electronic medical record implementation in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22(3):184-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000203821.02045.69. View

15.

Laerum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A . Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2001; 323(7325):1344-8. PMC: 60674. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344. View

16.

Shachak A, Hadas-Dayagi M, Ziv A, Reis S . Primary care physicians' use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24(3):341-8. PMC: 2642564. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0892-6. View

17.

Terry A, Thorpe C, Giles G, Brown J, Harris S, Reid G . Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2008; 54(5):730-6. PMC: 2377228. View

18.

DesRoches C, Campbell E, Rao S, Donelan K, Ferris T, Jha A . Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(1):50-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. View

19.

Burt C, Sisk J . Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records?. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24(5):1334-43. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1334. View

20.

Loomis G, Ries J, Saywell Jr R, Thakker N . If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?. J Fam Pract. 2002; 51(7):636-41. View