» Articles » PMID: 24968283

Background Selection As Baseline for Nucleotide Variation Across the Drosophila Genome

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Jun 27
PMID 24968283
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The constant removal of deleterious mutations by natural selection causes a reduction in neutral diversity and efficacy of selection at genetically linked sites (a process called Background Selection, BGS). Population genetic studies, however, often ignore BGS effects when investigating demographic events or the presence of other types of selection. To obtain a more realistic evolutionary expectation that incorporates the unavoidable consequences of deleterious mutations, we generated high-resolution landscapes of variation across the Drosophila melanogaster genome under a BGS scenario independent of polymorphism data. We find that BGS plays a significant role in shaping levels of variation across the entire genome, including long introns and intergenic regions distant from annotated genes. We also find that a very large percentage of the observed variation in diversity across autosomes can be explained by BGS alone, up to 70% across individual chromosome arms at 100-kb scale, thus indicating that BGS predictions can be used as baseline to infer additional types of selection and demographic events. This approach allows detecting several outlier regions with signal of recent adaptive events and selective sweeps. The use of a BGS baseline, however, is particularly appropriate to investigate the presence of balancing selection and our study exposes numerous genomic regions with the predicted signature of higher polymorphism than expected when a BGS context is taken into account. Importantly, we show that these conclusions are robust to the mutation and selection parameters of the BGS model. Finally, analyses of protein evolution together with previous comparisons of genetic maps between Drosophila species, suggest temporally variable recombination landscapes and, thus, local BGS effects that may differ between extant and past phases. Because genome-wide BGS and temporal changes in linkage effects can skew approaches to estimate demographic and selective events, future analyses should incorporate BGS predictions and capture local recombination variation across genomes and along lineages.

Citing Articles

FST and genetic diversity in an island model with background selection.

Hasan A, Whitlock M PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(12):e1011225.

PMID: 39621755 PMC: 11637402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011225.


Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.

Amin M, Hasan M, DeGiorgio M Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(12).

PMID: 39565932 PMC: 11631197. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae242.


Evolution of the Correlated Genomic Variation Landscape Across a Divergence Continuum in the Genus Castanopsis.

Chen X, Zhou B, Shi Y, Liu H, Liang Y, Ingvarsson P Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39248185 PMC: 11421576. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae191.


The Precision and Power of Population Branch Statistics in Identifying the Genomic Signatures of Local Adaptation.

Shpak M, Lawrence K, Pool J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38798330 PMC: 11118325. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.14.594139.


Background Selection From Unlinked Sites Causes Nonindependent Evolution of Deleterious Mutations.

Matheson J, Masel J Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38482769 PMC: 10972689. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae050.


References
1.
Stephan W, Song Y, Langley C . The hitchhiking effect on linkage disequilibrium between linked neutral loci. Genetics. 2006; 172(4):2647-63. PMC: 1456384. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.050179. View

2.
Eyre-Walker A, Keightley P . Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26(9):2097-108. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp119. View

3.
Hu T, Eisen M, Thornton K, Andolfatto P . A second-generation assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome provides new insights into patterns of lineage-specific divergence. Genome Res. 2012; 23(1):89-98. PMC: 3530686. DOI: 10.1101/gr.141689.112. View

4.
Llopart A . The rapid evolution of X-linked male-biased gene expression and the large-X effect in Drosophila yakuba, D. santomea, and their hybrids. Mol Biol Evol. 2012; 29(12):3873-86. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss190. View

5.
Charlesworth B, Langley C . The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements. Annu Rev Genet. 1989; 23:251-87. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001343. View