» Articles » PMID: 29807123

Fast-food, Everyday Life and Health: A Qualitative Study of 'chicken Shops' in East London

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2018 May 29
PMID 29807123
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The higher prevalence of fast food outlets in deprived areas has been associated with the production and maintenance of geographical inequalities in diet. In the UK one type of fast food outlet - the 'chicken shop' - has been the focus of intense public health and media interest. Despite ongoing concerns and initiatives around regulating these establishments, the 'chicken shop' is both a commercially successful and ubiquitous feature of disadvantaged urban neighbourhoods. However, little is known about how they are perceived by local residents. We report data from a qualitative study of neighbourhood perceptions in a low SES urban setting. Narrative family interviews, go-along interviews and school video focus group workshops with 66 residents of East London were conducted over two waves. The topic of chicken shops was a prolific theme and a narrative analysis of these accounts revealed that local perceptions of chicken shops are complex and contradictory. Chicken shops were depicted as both potentially damaging for the health of local residents and, at the same time, as valued community spaces. This contradiction was discursively addressed in narrative via a series of rhetorical rebuttals that negated their potential to damage health on the grounds of concepts such as trust, choice, balance, food hygiene and compensatory physical activity. In some instances, chicken shops were described as 'healthy' and patronising them constructed as part of a healthy lifestyle. Chicken shops are embedded in the social fabric of neighbourhoods. Successful strategies to improve diet therefore requires context-sensitive environmental interventions.

Citing Articles

Total Fat and Fatty Acid Content in Meals Served by Independent Takeaway Outlets Participating in the Healthier Catering Commitment Initiative in London, UK.

Jaworowska A, Force S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857574 PMC: 11764605. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010121.


Young people's views and experience of diet-related inequalities in England (UK): a qualitative study.

Er V, Crowder M, Holding E, Woodrow N, Griffin N, Summerbell C Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(4).

PMID: 39175414 PMC: 11341847. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae107.


Beyond individual responsibility: Exploring lay understandings of the contribution of environments on personal trajectories of obesity.

Serrano-Fuentes N, Rogers A, Portillo M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302927.

PMID: 38718062 PMC: 11078422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302927.


A critical exploration of the diets of UK disadvantaged communities to inform food systems transformation: a scoping review of qualitative literature using a social practice theory lens.

Hunt L, Pettinger C, Wagstaff C BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1970.

PMID: 37821837 PMC: 10568843. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16804-3.


The interplay between social and food environments on UK adolescents' food choices: implications for policy.

Shaw S, Muir S, Strommer S, Crozier S, Cooper C, Smith D Health Promot Int. 2023; 38(4).

PMID: 37647523 PMC: 10468012. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad097.


References
1.
Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Swinglehurst D . Narrative methods in quality improvement research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14(6):443-9. PMC: 1744090. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014712. View

2.
Carpiano R . Come take a walk with me: the "go-along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health Place. 2008; 15(1):263-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003. View

3.
Dwyer J, Needham L, Simpson J, Heeney E . Parents report intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental barriers to supporting healthy eating and physical activity among their preschoolers. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008; 33(2):338-46. DOI: 10.1139/H07-195. View

4.
Jiao J, Moudon A, Kim S, Hurvitz P, Drewnowski A . Health Implications of Adults' Eating at and Living near Fast Food or Quick Service Restaurants. Nutr Diabetes. 2015; 5:e171. PMC: 4521173. DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2015.18. View

5.
Smith N, Clark C, Fahy A, Tharmaratnam V, Lewis D, Thompson C . The Olympic Regeneration in East London (ORiEL) study: protocol for a prospective controlled quasi-experiment to evaluate the impact of urban regeneration on young people and their families. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4). PMC: 3432843. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001840. View