» Articles » PMID: 29800211

Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29800211
Citations 184
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, may be effective for treating episodic migraine.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine with a monthly dosing regimen or a single higher dose.

Design And Setting: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted at 123 sites in 9 countries from March 23, 2016 (first patient randomized), to April 10, 2017, consisting of a screening visit, 28-day pretreatment period, 12-week treatment period, and final evaluation at week 12.

Participants: Study participants were aged 18 to 70 years with episodic migraine (6-14 headache days, with at least 4 migraine days, during 28-day pretreatment period). Patients who had previous treatment failure with 2 classes of migraine-preventive medication were excluded.

Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous monthly dosing of fremanezumab (n = 290; 225 mg at baseline, week 4, and week 8); a single higher dose of fremanezumab, as intended to support a quarterly dose regimen (n = 291; 675 mg of fremanezumab at baseline; placebo at weeks 4 and 8); or placebo (n = 294; at baseline, week 4, and week 8).

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point was mean change in mean number of monthly migraine days during the 12-week period after the first dose.

Results: Among 875 patients who were randomized (mean age, 41.8 [SD, 12.1] years; 742 women [85%]), 791 (90.4%) completed the trial. From baseline to 12 weeks, mean migraine days per month decreased from 8.9 days to 4.9 days in the fremanezumab monthly dosing group, from 9.2 days to 5.3 days in the fremanezumab single-higher-dose group, and from 9.1 days to 6.5 days in the placebo group. This resulted in a difference with monthly dosing vs placebo of -1.5 days (95% CI, -2.01 to -0.93 days; P < .001) and with single higher dosing vs placebo of -1.3 days (95% CI, -1.79 to -0.72 days; P < .001). The most common adverse events that led to discontinuation were injection site erythema (n = 3), injection site induration (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 2), anxiety (n = 2), and depression (n = 2).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among patients with episodic migraine in whom multiple medication classes had not previously failed, subcutaneous fremanezumab, compared with placebo, resulted in a statistically significant 1.3- to 1.5-day reduction in the mean number of monthly migraine days over a 12-week period. Further research is needed to assess effectiveness against other preventive medications and in patients in whom multiple preventive drug classes have failed and to determine long-term safety and efficacy.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02629861.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and continuability of 675 mg fremanezumab administration over 2 years.

Yoshida S, Imai N, Keicho M, Kamimura J, Moriya A, Yagi N J Headache Pain. 2025; 26(1):51.

PMID: 40069630 PMC: 11898999. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-01994-5.


Real-World Lessons with Fremanezumab as the Third Available CGRP Monoclonal Antibody in a Third-Level Hospital: Focus on the Factors Predicting Response.

Polanco M, Garate G, Sanchez-Gudin J, Madera J, Pascual J, Gonzalez-Quintanilla V J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004586 PMC: 11856491. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041054.


Review: An Update on CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for the Preventive Treatment of Episodic Migraine.

Nicol K, Burkett J Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025; 29(1):55.

PMID: 39998706 PMC: 11861264. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-025-01365-4.


US Real-World Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Addition of Fremanezumab for Preventive Treatment in Patients Using Gepants for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Results From a Retrospective Chart Review.

Eugeni P, Rooney M, Saikali N, Niu Z, Driessen M, Krasenbaum L Adv Ther. 2025; 42(2):1207-1221.

PMID: 39775579 PMC: 11787160. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03063-w.


Real-world clinical results of CGRP monoclonal antibody treatment for medication overuse headache of migraine without abrupt drug discontinuation and no hospitalization.

Tanei T, Fuse Y, Maesawa S, Nishimura Y, Ishizaki T, Nagashima Y Heliyon. 2025; 10(22):e40190.

PMID: 39748981 PMC: 11693917. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40190.


References
1.
Lipton R, Stewart W, Diamond S, Diamond M, Reed M . Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001; 41(7):646-57. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x. View

2.
Lipton R, Stewart W, Sawyer J, EDMEADS J . Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2001; 41(9):854-61. View

3.
Goadsby P, Edvinsson L, Ekman R . Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol. 1990; 28(2):183-7. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410280213. View

4.
Lipton R, Bigal M, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed M, Stewart W . Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007; 68(5):343-9. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21. View

5.
Bigal M, Lipton R . Clinical course in migraine: conceptualizing migraine transformation. Neurology. 2008; 71(11):848-55. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000325565.63526.d2. View