» Articles » PMID: 29795964

Comparative Chemometric Analysis for Classification of Acids and Bases Via a Colorimetric Sensor Array

Overview
Journal J Chemom
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29795964
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the increasing availability of digital imaging devices, colorimetric sensor arrays are rapidly becoming a simple, yet effective tool for the identification and quantification of various analytes. Colorimetric arrays utilize colorimetric data from many colorimetric sensors, with the multidimensional nature of the resulting data necessitating the use of chemometric analysis. Herein, an 8 sensor colorimetric array was used to analyze select acid and basic samples (0.5 - 10 M) to determine which chemometric methods are best suited for classification quantification of analytes within clusters. PCA, HCA, and LDA were used to visualize the data set. All three methods showed well-separated clusters for each of the acid or base analytes and moderate separation between analyte concentrations, indicating that the sensor array can be used to identify and quantify samples. Furthermore, PCA could be used to determine which sensors showed the most effective analyte identification. LDA, KNN, and HQI were used for identification of analyte and concentration. HQI and KNN could be used to correctly identify the analytes in all cases, while LDA correctly identified 95 of 96 analytes correctly. Additional studies demonstrated that controlling for solvent and image effects was unnecessary for all chemometric methods utilized in this study.

Citing Articles

Non-Destructive Genotyping of Cultivars and Strains of Sesame through NIR Spectroscopy and Chemometrics.

Panero F, Smiderle O, Panero J, Faria F, Panero P, Rodriguez A Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35200330 PMC: 8869549. DOI: 10.3390/bios12020069.


Facilitating an International Research Experience Focused on Applied Nanotechnology and Surface Chemistry for American Undergraduate Students Collaborating with Mentors at a German Educational and Research Institution.

Wilson C, Hirtz M, Levkin P, Sutlief A, Holmes A J Chem Educ. 2021; 96(11):2441-2449.

PMID: 33911314 PMC: 8078009. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00146.


An Improved Comparison of Chemometric Analyses for the Identification of Acids and Bases With Colorimetric Sensor Arrays.

Kangas M, Wilson C, Burks R, Atwater J, Lukowicz R, Garver B Int J Chem. 2019; 10(2):36-55.

PMID: 31745401 PMC: 6863514. DOI: 10.5539/ijc.v10n2p36.


The Identification of Seven Chemical Warfare Mimics Using a Colorimetric Array.

Kangas M, Ernest A, Lukowicz R, Mora A, Quossi A, Perez M Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(12).

PMID: 30563195 PMC: 6308461. DOI: 10.3390/s18124291.

References
1.
Capel-Cuevas S, Cuellar M, de Orbe-Paya I, Pegalajar M, Capitan-Vallvey L . Full-range optical pH sensor based on imaging techniques. Anal Chim Acta. 2010; 681(1-2):71-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.09.033. View

2.
Gryniewicz-Ruzicka C, Rodriguez J, Arzhantsev S, Buhse L, Kauffman J . Libraries, classifiers, and quantifiers: a comparison of chemometric methods for the analysis of Raman spectra of contaminated pharmaceutical materials. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011; 61:191-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.12.002. View

3.
Batres G, Jones T, Johnke H, Wilson M, Holmes A, Sikich S . Reactive Arrays of Colorimetric Sensors for Metabolite and Steroid Identification. J Sens Technol. 2014; 4(1). PMC: 4091918. DOI: 10.4236/jst.2014.41001. View

4.
Lim S, Feng L, Kemling J, Musto C, Suslick K . An optoelectronic nose for the detection of toxic gases. Nat Chem. 2010; 1(7):562-7. PMC: 2761044. DOI: 10.1038/nchem.360. View

5.
Bhaskar H, Hoyle D, Singh S . Machine learning in bioinformatics: a brief survey and recommendations for practitioners. Comput Biol Med. 2005; 36(10):1104-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.09.002. View