» Articles » PMID: 29794239

Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29794239
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Standard assessment criteria for brain tumors that only include anatomic imaging continue to be insufficient. While numerous studies have demonstrated the value of DSC-MR imaging perfusion metrics for this purpose, they have not been incorporated due to a lack of confidence in the consistency of DSC-MR imaging metrics across sites and platforms. This study addresses this limitation with a comparison of multisite/multiplatform analyses of shared DSC-MR imaging datasets of patients with brain tumors.

Materials And Methods: DSC-MR imaging data were collected after a preload and during a bolus injection of gadolinium contrast agent using a gradient recalled-echo-EPI sequence (TE/TR = 30/1200 ms; flip angle = 72°). Forty-nine low-grade ( = 13) and high-grade ( = 36) glioma datasets were uploaded to The Cancer Imaging Archive. Datasets included a predetermined arterial input function, enhancing tumor ROIs, and ROIs necessary to create normalized relative CBV and CBF maps. Seven sites computed 20 different perfusion metrics. Pair-wise agreement among sites was assessed with the Lin concordance correlation coefficient. Distinction of low- from high-grade tumors was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test followed by receiver operating characteristic analysis to identify the optimal thresholds based on sensitivity and specificity.

Results: For normalized relative CBV and normalized CBF, 93% and 94% of entries showed good or excellent cross-site agreement (0.8 ≤ Lin concordance correlation coefficient ≤ 1.0). All metrics could distinguish low- from high-grade tumors. Optimum thresholds were determined for pooled data (normalized relative CBV = 1.4, sensitivity/specificity = 90%:77%; normalized CBF = 1.58, sensitivity/specificity = 86%:77%).

Conclusions: By means of DSC-MR imaging data obtained after a preload of contrast agent, substantial consistency resulted across sites for brain tumor perfusion metrics with a common threshold discoverable for distinguishing low- from high-grade tumors.

Citing Articles

Exploring adult glioma through MRI: A review of publicly available datasets to guide efficient image analysis.

Abbad Andaloussi M, Maser R, Hertel F, Lamoline F, Husch A Neurooncol Adv. 2025; 7(1):vdae197.

PMID: 39877749 PMC: 11773385. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae197.


Mask region-based convolutional neural network and VGG-16 inspired brain tumor segmentation.

Basha N, Ananth C, Muthukumaran K, Sudhamsu G, Mittal V, Gared F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17615.

PMID: 39080324 PMC: 11289405. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66554-4.


Identification of a Single-Dose, Low-Flip-Angle-Based CBV Threshold for Fractional Tumor Burden Mapping in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Anil A, Stokes A, Karis J, Bell L, Eschbacher J, Jennings K AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 45(10):1545-1551.

PMID: 38782593 PMC: 11448978. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8357.


Hemodynamic property incorporated brain tumor segmentation by deep learning and density-based analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Tang L, Wu T, Hu R, Gu Q, Yang X, Mao H Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(4):2774-2787.

PMID: 38617153 PMC: 11007532. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1471.


Tumor-like Lesions in Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System: The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differential Diagnosis.

Zedde M, Napoli M, Moratti C, Pavone C, Bonacini L, Cecco G Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535038 PMC: 10969781. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060618.


References
1.
Paulson E, Schmainda K . Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology. 2008; 249(2):601-13. PMC: 2657863. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492071659. View

2.
Lev M, Ozsunar Y, Henson J, Rasheed A, Barest G, Harsh 4th G . Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(2):214-21. PMC: 7974605. View

3.
Jiang Z, Le Bas J, Grand S, Salon C, Pasteris C, Hoffmann D . Prognostic value of perfusion MR imaging in patients with oligodendroglioma: A survival study. J Neuroradiol. 2010; 38(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2010.03.004. View

4.
Paulson E, Prah D, Schmainda K . Spiral Perfusion Imaging With Consecutive Echoes (SPICE™) for the Simultaneous Mapping of DSC- and DCE-MRI Parameters in Brain Tumor Patients: Theory and Initial Feasibility. Tomography. 2017; 2(4):295-307. PMC: 5226659. DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00217. View

5.
Menze B, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J . The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014; 34(10):1993-2024. PMC: 4833122. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694. View