» Articles » PMID: 29794055

Genetic Variation of the SusC/SusD Homologs from a Polysaccharide Utilization Locus Underlies Divergent Fructan Specificities and Functional Adaptation in Strains

Overview
Journal mSphere
Date 2018 May 26
PMID 29794055
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic differences between gut-resident bacterial strains likely underlie significant interindividual variation in microbiome function. Traditional methods of determining community composition, such as 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, fail to capture this functional diversity. Metagenomic approaches are a significant step forward in identifying strain-level sequence variants; however, given the current paucity of biochemical information, they too are limited to mainly low-resolution and incomplete functional predictions. Using genomic, biochemical, and molecular approaches, we identified differences in the fructan utilization profiles of two closely related strains. 8736 () contains a fructan polysaccharide utilization locus (PUL) with a divergent / homolog gene pair that enables it to utilize inulin, differentiating this strain from other characterized strains. Transfer of the distinct pair of / genes from into the noninulin using type strain resulted in inulin use by the recipient strain, (). The presence of the divergent / gene pair alone enabled the hybrid () strain to outcompete the wild-type strain in mice fed an inulin diet. Further, we discovered that the / homolog gene pair facilitated import of inulin into the periplasm without surface predigestion by an endo-acting enzyme, possibly due to the short average chain length of inulin compared to many other polysaccharides. Our data builds upon recent reports of dietary polysaccharide utilization mechanisms found in members of the genus and demonstrates how the acquisition of two genes can alter the functionality and success of a strain within the gut. Dietary polysaccharides play a dominant role in shaping the composition and functionality of our gut microbiota. Dietary interventions using these icrobiota-ccessible arbohydrates (MACs) serve as a promising tool for manipulating the gut microbial community. However, our current gap in knowledge regarding microbial metabolic pathways that are involved in the degradation of these MACs has made the design of rational interventions difficult. The issue is further complicated by the diversity of pathways observed for the utilization of similar MACs, even in closely related microbial strains. Our current work focuses on divergent fructan utilization pathways in two closely related strains and provides an integrated approach to characterize the molecular basis for strain-level functional differences.

Citing Articles

Epigenetic phase variation in the gut microbiome enhances bacterial adaptation.

Ni M, Fan Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Qiao W, Davey L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829898 PMC: 11741434. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.11.632565.


Transcriptional delineation of polysaccharide utilization loci in the human gut commensal DSM18205 and co-culture with exemplar species on dietary plant glycans.

Panwar D, Briggs J, Fraser A, Stewart W, Brumer H Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 91(1):e0175924.

PMID: 39636128 PMC: 11784079. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01759-24.


Classifying compounds as prebiotics - scientific perspectives and recommendations.

Hutkins R, Walter J, Gibson G, Bedu-Ferrari C, Scott K, Tancredi D Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 22(1):54-70.

PMID: 39358591 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-00981-6.


Exploring strain-level diversity in the gut microbiome through mucin particle adhesion.

Nishiyama K, Murakami R, Nakahata M, Zhou B, Hashikura N, Kaneko H Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(9):e0123524.

PMID: 39133001 PMC: 11409716. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01235-24.


Identification of carbohydrate gene clusters obtained from in vitro fermentations as predictive biomarkers of prebiotic responses.

Kok C, Rose D, Cui J, Whisenhunt L, Hutkins R BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):183.

PMID: 38796418 PMC: 11127362. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03344-y.


References
1.
Sonnenburg J, Xu J, Leip D, Chen C, Westover B, Weatherford J . Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science. 2005; 307(5717):1955-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1109051. View

2.
Eren A, Borisy G, Huse S, Welch J . Oligotyping analysis of the human oral microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(28):E2875-84. PMC: 4104879. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1409644111. View

3.
Rakoff-Nahoum S, Foster K, Comstock L . The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota. Nature. 2016; 533(7602):255-9. PMC: 4978124. DOI: 10.1038/nature17626. View

4.
Franzosa E, Hsu T, Sirota-Madi A, Shafquat A, Abu-Ali G, Morgan X . Sequencing and beyond: integrating molecular 'omics' for microbial community profiling. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015; 13(6):360-72. PMC: 4800835. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3451. View

5.
Shipman J, Berleman J, Salyers A . Characterization of four outer membrane proteins involved in binding starch to the cell surface of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182(19):5365-72. PMC: 110978. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.19.5365-5372.2000. View