The DiPEP Study: an Observational Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Assessment, D-dimer and Chest X-ray for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy and Postpartum
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To identify clinical features associated with pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis and determine the accuracy of decision rules and D-dimer for diagnosing suspected PE in pregnant/postpartum women DESIGN: Observational cohort study augmented with additional cases.
Setting: Emergency departments and maternity units at eleven prospectively recruiting sites and maternity units in the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) POPULATION: 324 pregnant/postpartum women with suspected PE and 198 pregnant/postpartum women with diagnosed PE METHODS: We recorded clinical features, elements of clinical decision rules, D-dimer measurements, imaging results, treatments and adverse outcomes up to 30 days MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women were classified as having PE on the basis of imaging, treatment and adverse outcomes by assessors blind to clinical features and D-dimer. Primary analysis was limited to women with conclusive imaging to avoid work-up bias. Secondary analyses included women with clinically diagnosed or ruled out PE.
Results: The only clinical features associated with PE on multivariate analysis were age (odds ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.11), previous thrombosis (3.07; 1.05-8.99), family history of thrombosis (0.35; 0.14-0.90), temperature (2.22; 1.26-3.91), systolic blood pressure (0.96; 0.93-0.99), oxygen saturation (0.87; 0.78-0.97) and PE-related chest x-ray abnormality (13.4; 1.39-130.2). Clinical decision rules had areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve ranging from 0.577 to 0.732 and no clinically useful threshold for decision-making. Sensitivities and specificities of D-dimer were 88.4% and 8.8% using a standard threshold and 69.8% and 32.8% using a pregnancy-specific threshold.
Conclusions: Clinical decision rules and D-dimer should not be used to select pregnant or postpartum women with suspected PE for further investigation. Clinical features and chest x-ray appearances may have counter-intuitive associations with PE in this context.
Tweetable Abstract: Clinical decision rules and D-dimer are not helpful for diagnosing pregnant/postpartum women with suspected PE.
Ebrahim Babai M, Kabiri A, Movahedi M, Ghahiri A, Hajhashemi M, Dehghan M Adv Biomed Res. 2024; 13:76.
PMID: 39512403 PMC: 11542693. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_257_23.
Emergency department diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.
Wrenn J, Kabrhel C Br J Haematol. 2024; 205(5):1714-1716.
PMID: 39183380 PMC: 11884313. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19725.
Diagnostic value of D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio for pulmonary embolism in postpartum women.
Zhou W, Qu C, Liu X, Huang J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):482.
PMID: 39014319 PMC: 11251229. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06670-1.
Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: A Review for Clinical Practitioners.
Makowska A, Treumann T, Venturini S, Christ M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).
PMID: 38792409 PMC: 11121909. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102863.
An audit of CTPA and V/Q scan for investigation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.
Ehrlich R, Lowe S Obstet Med. 2024; 17(2):92-95.
PMID: 38784183 PMC: 11110744. DOI: 10.1177/1753495X231197563.