» Articles » PMID: 29781719

Serum Vitamin D Status and Breast Cancer Risk by Receptor Status: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Nutr Cancer
Publisher Routledge
Date 2018 May 22
PMID 29781719
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The association between vitamin D status and breast cancer risk is equivocal. No systematic reviews or meta-analyses have examined this association stratified by receptor status. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review to answer the question, "Is there a relationship between lower serum/plasma vitamin D levels and increased risk of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) specifically?"

Methods: We systematically searched Embase and PubMed databases for published original research studies examining the risk of a breast cancer diagnosis according to vitamin D status. We excluded studies that did not provide risk estimates stratified by receptor status.

Results: Fourteen studies met our criteria, including case-control, nested case-control, and case-series studies, reflecting the cumulative results of 13,135 breast cancer cases. When grouped by relevancy to TNBC, the proportion of analyses across all study types showing a significant association between vitamin D status and breast cancer diagnosis was 37% for non-TNBC analyses, 48% for analyses that included some TNBC cases, and 88% for TNBC analyses.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that low vitamin D status may particularly increase the risk of TNBC, although more research is needed to determine if this association is causative. Women should be routinely screened for 25(OH)D deficiency.

Citing Articles

Personal history of irradiation and risk of breast cancer: A Mendelian randomisation study.

Liu Y, Liu Z, Chen J, Liang M, Cai C, Zou F J Glob Health. 2024; 14:04106.

PMID: 39391896 PMC: 11467774. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04106.


Causes and Risk Factors of Breast Cancer, What Do We Know for Sure? An Evidence Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Loyland B, Sandbekken I, Grov E, Utne I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672665 PMC: 11049405. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081583.


Vitamin K2 enhances the tumor suppressive effects of 1,25(OH)D in triple negative breast cancer cells.

Narvaez C, Bak M, Salman N, Welsh J J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2023; 231:106307.

PMID: 37030416 PMC: 10752295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2023.106307.


Prevalence and Relevance of Vitamin D Deficiency in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.

Zemlin C, Altmayer L, Stuhlert C, Schleicher J, Wormann C, Lang M Nutrients. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 36986179 PMC: 10056197. DOI: 10.3390/nu15061450.


Vitamin D as a Potential Preventive Agent For Young Women's Breast Cancer.

Bernhardt S, Borges V, Schedin P Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021; 14(9):825-838.

PMID: 34244152 PMC: 8937000. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0114.


References
1.
Janssen M, Wielders J, Bekker C, Boesten L, Buijs M, Heijboer A . Multicenter comparison study of current methods to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum. Steroids. 2012; 77(13):1366-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.07.013. View

2.
Wang D, Velez de-la-Paz O, Zhai J, Liu D . Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34(6):3509-17. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-0929-2. View

3.
Kim Y, Je Y . Vitamin D intake, blood 25(OH)D levels, and breast cancer risk or mortality: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(11):2772-84. PMC: 4037823. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.175. View

4.
Forrest K, Stuhldreher W . Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in US adults. Nutr Res. 2011; 31(1):48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2010.12.001. View

5.
Peairs K, Choi Y, Stewart R, Sateia H . Screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2017; 44(1):60-72. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.02.004. View