» Articles » PMID: 29769058

Efficacy of Standardized Training on a Virtual Reality Simulator to Advance Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopic Motor Skills

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2018 May 18
PMID 29769058
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Most studies demonstrated, that training on a virtual reality based arthroscopy simulator leads to an improvement of technical skills in orthopaedic surgery. However, how long and what kind of training is optimal for young residents is unknown. In this study we tested the efficacy of a standardized, competency based training protocol on a validated virtual reality based knee- and shoulder arthroscopy simulator.

Methods: Twenty residents and five experts in arthroscopy were included. All participants performed a test including knee -and shoulder arthroscopy tasks on a virtual reality knee- and shoulder arthroscopy simulator. The residents had to complete a competency based training program. Thereafter, the previously completed test was retaken. We evaluated the metric data of the simulator using a z-score and the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) to assess training effects in residents and performance levels in experts.

Results: The residents significantly improved from pre- to post training in the overall z-score: - 9.82 (range, - 20.35 to - 1.64) to - 2.61 (range, - 6.25 to 1.5); p < 0.001. The overall ASSET score improved from 55 (27 to 84) percent to 75 (48 to 92) percent; p < 0.001. The experts, however, achieved a significantly higher z-score in the shoulder tasks (p < 0.001 and a statistically insignificantly higher z-score in the knee tasks with a p = 0.921. The experts mean overall ASSET score (knee and shoulder) was significantly higher in the therapeutic tasks (p < 0.001) compared to the residents post training result.

Conclusions: The use of a competency based simulator training with this specific device for 3-5 h is an effective tool to advance basic arthroscopic skills of resident in training from 0 to 5 years based on simulator measures and simulator based ASSET testing. Therefore, we conclude that this sort of training method appears useful to learn the handling of the camera, basic anatomy and the triangulation with instruments.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the proficiency level of novices in distal intramedullary nail interlocking achieved through training with Digitally Enhanced Hands-on Surgical Training (DEHST).

Pastor T, Buschbaum J, von Laue M, Link B, Beeres F, Fletcher J Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):7.

PMID: 39799277 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02686-6.


Exploring prospects, hurdles, and road ahead for generative artificial intelligence in orthopedic education and training.

Gupta N, Khatri K, Malik Y, Lakhani A, Kanwal A, Aggarwal S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1544.

PMID: 39732679 PMC: 11681633. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06592-8.


Leveraging digital twins for improved orthopaedic evaluation and treatment.

Dean M, Oeding J, Diniz P, Seil R, Samuelsson K J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70084.

PMID: 39530111 PMC: 11551062. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70084.


Evaluating effectiveness of cadaveric arthroscopic training for orthopaedic residents: A comparison of joints and training levels.

Chuang H, Kuan F, Su W, Shih C, Chiang C, Ko P J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12030.

PMID: 38774580 PMC: 11106551. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12030.


Virtual Reality and Surgical Simulation Training for Orthopaedic Surgery Residents: A Qualitative Assessment of Trainee Perspectives.

Kuhn A, Yu J, Gerull K, Silverman R, Aleem A JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(1).

PMID: 38511201 PMC: 10950179. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00142.


References
1.
Koehler R, Amsdell S, Arendt E, Bisson L, Braman J, Bramen J . The Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(6):1229-37. PMC: 4134966. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513483535. View

2.
Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Hance J, Darzi A . A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. Am J Surg. 2006; 191(1):128-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.014. View

3.
Tuijthof G, Visser P, Sierevelt I, van Dijk C, Kerkhoffs G . Does perception of usefulness of arthroscopic simulators differ with levels of experience?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(6):1701-8. PMC: 3094627. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1797-y. View

4.
Cannon W, Garrett Jr W, Hunter R, Sweeney H, Eckhoff D, Nicandri G . Improving residency training in arthroscopic knee surgery with use of a virtual-reality simulator. A randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(21):1798-806. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00058. View

5.
Aim F, Lonjon G, Hannouche D, Nizard R . Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2015; 32(1):224-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.023. View