The Number of Arthroscopies Performed by Trainees Does Not Deduce the Level of Their Arthroscopic Proficiency

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2023 Jun 9

PMID 37296326

Authors

Hermann Anetzberger

Andreas Kugler

Dominik John

Sebastian Kopf

Roland Becker

Stephan Reppenhagen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: It is reasonable to question whether the case volume is a suitable proxy for the manual competence of an arthroscopic surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the number of arthroscopies previously performed and the arthroscopic skills acquired using a standardized simulator test.

Methods: A total of 97 resident and early orthopaedic surgeons who participated in arthroscopic simulator training courses were divided into five groups based on their self-reported number of arthroscopic surgeries: (1) none, (2) < 10, (3) 10 to 19, (4) 20 to 39 and (5) 40 to 100. Arthroscopic manual skills were evaluated with a simulator by means of the diagnostic arthroscopy skill score (DASS) before and after training. Seventy-five points out of 100 must be achieved to pass the test.

Results: In the pretest, only three trainees in group 5 passed the arthroscopic skill test, and all other participants failed. Group 5 (57 ± 17 points; n = 17) scored significantly higher than the other groups (group 1: 30 ± 14, n = 20; group 2: 35 ± 14, n = 24; group 3: 35 ± 18, n = 23; and group 4: 33 ± 17, n = 13). After a two-day simulator training, trainees showed a significant increase in performance. In group 5, participants scored 81 ± 17 points, which was significantly higher than the other groups (group 1: 75 ± 16; group 2: 75 ± 14; group 3: 69 ± 15; and group 4: 73 ± 13). While self-reported arthroscopic procedures were n.s. associated with higher log odds of passing the test (p = 0.423), the points scored in the pretest were found to be a good predictor of whether a trainee would pass the test (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the points scored in the pretest and the posttest (p < 0.05, r = 0.59, r = 0.34).

Conclusions: The number of previously performed arthroscopies is not a reliable indicator of the skills level of orthopaedic residents. A reasonable alternative in the future would be to verify arthroscopic proficiency on the simulator by means of a score as a pass-fail examination.

Level Of Evidence: III.

References

Almasri M, Ayeni O . Editorial Commentary: Defining Proficiency in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery Is Facing Its Own Learning Curve. Arthroscopy. 2020; 36(12):3106-3107. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.028. View

Anetzberger H, Becker R, Eickhoff H, Seibert F, Doring B, Haasters F . The Diagnostic Arthroscopy Skill Score (DASS): a reliable and suitable assessment tool for arthroscopic skill training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(1):349-360. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06554-3. View

Angelo R, Ryu R, Pedowitz R, Beach W, Burns J, Dodds J . A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(10):1854-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.001. View

Bartlett J, Lawrence J, Khanduja V . Virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator demonstrates sufficient face validity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(10):3162-3167. PMC: 6754348. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5038-8. View

Bauer H, Honselmann K . Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?. Visc Med. 2017; 33(2):106-116. PMC: 5447172. DOI: 10.1159/000456041. View

Bishop M, Ode G, Hurwit D, Zmugg S, Rauck R, Nguyen J . The Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool Global Rating Scale is a Valid and Reliable Adjunct Measure of Performance on a Virtual Reality Simulator for Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021; 37(6):1856-1866. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.046. View

Boutefnouchet T, Laios T . Transfer of arthroscopic skills from computer simulation training to the operating theatre: a review of evidence from two randomised controlled studies. SICOT J. 2016; 2:4. PMC: 4849227. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2015039. View

Cychosz C, Tofte J, Johnson A, Gao Y, Phisitkul P . Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Surgery Training Program Improves Knee Arthroscopy Simulator Performance in Arthroscopic Trainees. Arthroscopy. 2018; 34(5):1543-1549. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.028. View

Fahl J, Duvivier R, Reinke L, Pierie J, Schonrock-Adema J . Towards best practice in developing motor skills: a systematic review on spacing in VR simulator-based psychomotor training for surgical novices. BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):154. PMC: 10009969. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04046-1. View

10.

Feeley A, Gibbons J, Feeley I, Fitzgerald E, Merghani K, Sheehan E . Hand dominance and experience improve bimanual performance on arthroscopic simulator task. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(10):3328-3333. PMC: 9464134. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06920-9. View

11.

Feldman M, Brand J, Rossi M, Lubowitz J . Arthroscopic Training in the 21st Century: A Changing Paradigm. Arthroscopy. 2017; 33(11):1913-1915. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.241. View

12.

Gallagher A, Mottrie A, Angelo R . Competence Is About Skill, Not Procedure Case Numbers. JAMA Surg. 2021; 157(1):81. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4414. View

13.

Gallagher A, Matt Ritter E, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried M, Moses G . Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005; 241(2):364-72. PMC: 1356924. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80. View

14.

Go C, Kyin C, Maldonado D, Domb B . Surgeon Experience in Hip Arthroscopy Affects Surgical Time, Complication Rate, and Reoperation Rate: A Systematic Review on the Learning Curve. Arthroscopy. 2020; 36(12):3092-3105. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.033. View

15.

Harato K, Kobayashi S, Toyoda T, Hasegawa T, Tsukimura Y, Niki Y . Technical Obstacles for Low-Volume Surgeons in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019; 33(12):1238-1242. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692674. View

16.

Hauschild J, Rivera J, Johnson A, Burns T, Roach C . Shoulder Arthroscopy Simulator Training Improves Surgical Procedure Performance: A Controlled Laboratory Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(5):23259671211003873. PMC: 8113660. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211003873. View

17.

Hopkins L, Robinson D, Brown C, Egan R, Iorwerth A, Holt M . Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery Curriculum Concordance: An Operative Learning Curve Trajectory Perspective. J Surg Educ. 2019; 76(6):1569-1578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.009. View

18.

Hughes J, Gibbs C, Almast A, Atte A, Sansone M, Karlsson J . More anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by surgeons with high volume compared to low volume. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(6):2014-2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06875-x. View

19.

Keyt L, Jensen A, ODriscoll S, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey M, Camp C . Establishing the learning curve for elbow arthroscopy: surgeon and trainee perspectives on number of cases needed and optimal methods for acquiring skill. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(11):e434-e442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.022. View

20.

Koehler R, Goldblatt J, Maloney M, Voloshin I, Nicandri G . Assessing Diagnostic Arthroscopy Performance in the Operating Room Using the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(12):2314-9.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.011. View