» Articles » PMID: 29760221

Development and Validation of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Signature That Predicts Early ADT Treatment Response Following Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract

Currently, no genomic signature exists to distinguish men most likely to progress on adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Here we develop and validate a gene expression signature to predict response to postoperative ADT. A training set consisting of 284 radical prostatectomy patients was established after 1:1 propensity score matching metastasis between adjuvant-ADT (a-ADT)-treated and no ADT-treated groups. An ADT Response Signature (ADT-RS) was identified from neuroendocrine and AR signaling-related genes. Two independent cohorts were used to form three separate data sets for validation (set I, = 232; set II, = 435; set III, = 612). The primary endpoint of the analysis was postoperative metastasis. Increases in ADT-RS score were associated with a reduction in risk of metastasis only in a-ADT patients. On multivariable analysis, ADT-RS by ADT treatment interaction term remained associated with metastasis in both validation sets (set I: HR = 0.18, = 0.009; set II: HR = 0.25, = 0.019). In a matched validation set III, patients with Low ADT-RS scores had similar 10-year metastasis rates in the a-ADT and no-ADT groups (30.1% vs. 31.0%, = 0.989). Among High ADT-RS patients, 10-year metastasis rates were significantly lower for a-ADT versus no-ADT patients (9.4% vs. 29.2%, = 0.021). The marginal ADT-RS by ADT interaction remained significant in the matched dataset ( = 0.035). Patients with High ADT-RS benefited from a-ADT. In combination with prognostic risk factors, use of ADT-RS may thus allow for identification of ADT-responsive tumors that may benefit most from early androgen blockade after radical prostatectomy. We discovered a gene signature that when present in primary prostate tumors may be useful to predict patients who may respond to early ADT after surgery. .

Citing Articles

Systematic review and integrated analysis of prognostic gene signatures for prostate cancer patients.

An Y, Lu W, Li S, Lu X, Zhang Y, Han D Discov Oncol. 2023; 14(1):234.

PMID: 38112859 PMC: 10730790. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00847-4.


Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Chen J, Wang P, Liu M, Lyu F, Ma M, Ren X Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(21).

PMID: 37958246 PMC: 10649216. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213350.


Bioinformatics in urology - molecular characterization of pathophysiology and response to treatment.

Gheinani A, Kim J, You S, Adam R Nat Rev Urol. 2023; 21(4):214-242.

PMID: 37604982 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00805-3.


Transcriptomic Signatures Associated With Outcomes in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Treated With Salvage Radiation, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, and Enzalutamide: Correlative Analysis of the STREAM Trial.

Bitting R, Wu Y, Somarelli J, Proudfoot J, Liu Y, Davicioni E JCO Precis Oncol. 2023; 7:e2300214.

PMID: 37595184 PMC: 10581641. DOI: 10.1200/PO.23.00214.


Prevalence of tumour-infiltrating CD103 cells identifies therapeutic-sensitive prostate cancer with poor clinical outcome.

Zhou Q, Ou Y, Dai X, Chen X, Wu S, Chen W Br J Cancer. 2023; 128(8):1466-1477.

PMID: 36759726 PMC: 10070496. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02183-4.


References
1.
Spahn M, Briganti A, Capitanio U, Kneitz B, Gontero P, Karnes J . Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation in patients with clinical high risk prostate cancer and pT3 surgical margin positive disease. J Urol. 2012; 188(1):84-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2572. View

2.
Rolland T, Tasan M, Charloteaux B, Pevzner S, Zhong Q, Sahni N . A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell. 2014; 159(5):1212-1226. PMC: 4266588. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050. View

3.
Alibhai S, Breunis H, Timilshina N, Johnston C, Tomlinson G, Tannock I . Impact of androgen-deprivation therapy on physical function and quality of life in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(34):5038-45. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8091. View

4.
Boorjian S, Karnes R, Viterbo R, Rangel L, Bergstralh E, Horwitz E . Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011; 117(13):2883-91. PMC: 3139725. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25900. View

5.
Gunner C, Gulamhusein A, Rosario D . The modern role of androgen deprivation therapy in the management of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Urol. 2017; 9(2 Suppl):24-29. PMC: 5356175. DOI: 10.1177/2051415816654048. View