Cardiac Arrest in the Catheterization Laboratory

Overview

Journal Curr Cardiol Rev

Publisher Bentham Science Publishers

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2018 May 10

PMID 29741141

Citations 5

Authors

Kapil Yadav

Huu Tam Truong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac arrest in the Catheterization Lab is a rare and unique scenario that is often logistically challenging. It often has dire prognosis especially in patients suffering from severe pre-existing illnesses (high risk patient) such as acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, or patients undergoing high risk procedures. As the number of complex interventional procedures increases, cardiac arrest in the cath lab will become more common and optimal management of this scenario is critical for both the patient and operator.

Conclusion: In this review, we will discuss the special challenges during the resuscitation efforts in cath lab, especially with tradition chest compression. We will discuss the alternative options including mechanical compression devices and Invasive Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. Finally, we will offer management suggestions on selecting the appropriate circulatory support device based on clinical and anatomic risks.

Citing Articles

Risk factors of cardiac arrest during a percutaneous coronary intervention performed with rotational atherectomy - analysis based on a Large National Registry.

Silka W, Siudak Z, Malinowski K, Wanha W, Pawlowski T, Pietrasik A Cardiol J. 2024; 31(6):785-793.

PMID: 39225322 PMC: 11706255. DOI: 10.5603/cj.97069.

Revolutionizing Cardiac Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Approaches Outside the Operating Room.

Durai Samy N, Taksande K Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55611.

PMID: 38586747 PMC: 10995652. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55611.

Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in "hostile" environments: Using automated compression devices to minimize the rescuers' danger.

Latsios G, Leopoulou M, Synetos A, Karanasos A, Papanikolaou A, Bounas P World J Cardiol. 2023; 15(2):45-55.

PMID: 36911750 PMC: 9993930. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i2.45.

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Interventions with the LUCAS-2 System for Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Chyrchel M, Halubiec P, Duchnevic O, Lazarczyk A, Okarski M, Januszek R J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35807156 PMC: 9267592. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133872.

Interventional Cardiologist Approach to Cardiac Arrest.

Lotun K, Kern K Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018; 14(2):78.

PMID: 30003855 PMC: 6088449. DOI: 10.2174/1573403X1402180705163831.

References

Perkins G, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin C, Cooke M, Horton J . Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 385(9972):947-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9. View

Banjac I, Petrovic M, Akay M, Janowiak L, Radovancevic R, Nathan S . Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Procedural Rescue Strategy for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Cardiac Complications. ASAIO J. 2015; 62(1):e1-4. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000275. View

Sakamoto T, Morimura N, Nagao K, Asai Y, Yokota H, Nara S . Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6):762-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.031. View

Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, Diederich K, Hambrecht R, Niebauer J . Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(13):1276-83. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi161. View

Ong M, Ornato J, Edwards D, Dhindsa H, Best A, Ines C . Use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA. 2006; 295(22):2629-37. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.22.2629. View

Tuseth V, Salem M, Pettersen R, Grong K, Rotevatn S, Wentzel-Larsen T . Percutaneous left ventricular assist in ischemic cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(4):1365-72. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819c0642. View

William P, Rao P, Kanakadandi U, Asencio A, Kern K . Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In and On the Way to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Circ J. 2016; 80(6):1292-9. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0330. View

Levy M, Yost D, Walker R, Scheunemann E, Mendive S . A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015; 92:32-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.005. View

Derwall M, Brucken A, Bleilevens C, Ebeling A, Fohr P, Rossaint R . Doubling survival and improving clinical outcomes using a left ventricular assist device instead of chest compressions for resuscitation after prolonged cardiac arrest: a large animal study. Crit Care. 2015; 19:123. PMC: 4407317. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0864-2. View

10.

Ong M, Fook-Chong S, Annathurai A, Ang S, Tiah L, Yong K . Improved neurologically intact survival with the use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for cardiac arrest presenting to the emergency department. Crit Care. 2012; 16(4):R144. PMC: 3580732. DOI: 10.1186/cc11456. View

11.

Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Ostlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld R . Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2013; 311(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.282538. View

12.

ONeill W, Kleiman N, Moses J, Henriques J, Dixon S, Massaro J . A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012; 126(14):1717-27. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194. View

13.

Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S, Schopka S, Husser O, Hengstenberg C . Early experiences with miniaturized extracorporeal life-support in the catheterization laboratory. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42(5):858-63. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs176. View

14.

Ostadal P, Mlcek M, Holy F, Horakova S, Kralovec S, Skoda J . Direct comparison of percutaneous circulatory support systems in specific hemodynamic conditions in a porcine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(6):1202-6. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.973123. View

15.

Ikeno F, Kaneda H, Hongo Y, Sakanoue Y, Nolasco C, Emami S . Augmentation of tissue perfusion by a novel compression device increases neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2005; 68(1):109-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.05.024. View

16.

Venturini J, Retzer E, Estrada J, Friant J, Beiser D, Edelson D . Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Resuscitation. 2017; 115:56-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.037. View

17.

Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, Booth J, Pitt M, Blackman D . Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010; 304(8):867-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1190. View

18.

Vase H, Christensen S, Christiansen A, Therkelsen C, Christiansen E, Eiskjaer H . The Impella CP device for acute mechanical circulatory support in refractory cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016; 112:70-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.10.003. View

19.

Truhlar A, Deakin C, Soar J, Khalifa G, Alfonzo A, Bierens J . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2015; 95:148-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017. View

20.

Wagner H, Hardig B, Rundgren M, Zughaft D, Harnek J, Gotberg M . Mechanical chest compressions in the coronary catheterization laboratory to facilitate coronary intervention and survival in patients requiring prolonged resuscitation efforts. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24:4. PMC: 4721004. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-016-0198-3. View