» Articles » PMID: 27180892

Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation In and On the Way to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Overview
Journal Circ J
Date 2016 May 17
PMID 27180892
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac arrest, though not common during coronary angiography, is increasingly occurring in the catheterization laboratory because of the expanding complexity of percutaneous interventions (PCI) and the patient population being treated. Manual chest compression in the cath lab is not easily performed, often interrupted, and can result in the provider experiencing excessive radiation exposure. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provides unique advantages over manual performance of chest compression for treating cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab. Such advantages include the potential for uninterrupted chest compressions, less radiation exposure, better quality chest compressions, and less crowded conditions around the catheterization table, allowing more attention to ongoing PCI efforts during CPR. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not responding to standard ACLS therapy can be transported to the hospital while mechanical CPR is being performed to provide safe and continuous chest compressions en route. Once at the hospital, advanced circulatory support can be instituted during ongoing mechanical CPR. This article summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology and nature of cardiac arrest in the cardiac cath lab and discusses the mechanics of CPR and defibrillation in that setting. It also reviews the various types of mechanical CPR and their potential roles in and on the way to the laboratory. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1292-1299).

Citing Articles

Physiology-Guided Resuscitation: Monitoring and Augmenting Perfusion during Cardiopulmonary Arrest.

Bernard S, Pashun R, Varma B, Yuriditsky E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930056 PMC: 11205151. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123527.


In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Effective Transition from an ICU- to CCU-Led Resuscitation Team.

Sharma R, Bews H, Mahal H, Asselin C, OBrien M, Koley L J Interv Cardiol. 2019; 2019:1686350.

PMID: 31772514 PMC: 6766259. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1686350.


Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

Cha K, Kim H, Kim Y, Ahn G, Kim Y, Kim S PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221965.

PMID: 31469891 PMC: 6716643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221965.


Mechanical adjuncts for cardiocerebral resuscitation.

Riess M, Balzer C Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019; 16(9):771-776.

PMID: 31353970 PMC: 6733612. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1649135.


Cardiac Arrest in the Catheterization Laboratory.

Yadav K, Truong H Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018; 14(2):115-120.

PMID: 29741141 PMC: 6088444. DOI: 10.2174/1573403X14666180509144512.